Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/19604
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGlencross, Andrew-
dc.date.accessioned2014-04-02T23:20:22Z-
dc.date.issued2008-02-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/19604-
dc.description.abstractThis article explores how proposals for democratizing the European Union (EU) according to a supranational, contestational model are likely to disrupt its existing political system. The current EU is characterized by a dual system of representation that combines the representation of member states with that of individual citizens. Democratization typically entails enhancing the representation of individuals at the expense of state prerogatives. It is thus possible to make a pertinent analogy with the antebellum United States, which also featured dual representation, and where a great wave of democratization took place following Andrew Jackson's presidency (1829-1837). As the system of representation there became more majoritarian, John C. Calhoun led the calls for introducing new anti-majoritarian constitutional safeguards. A transatlantic comparison suggests the contestational system born of EU democratization will require institutional innovation in order to prove viable. In this context, Calhoun's theory of nullification, an ex post political mechanism wielded by the units to stymie federal legislation, appears more appropriate as an anti-majoritarian bulwark and better able to engender constitutional debate over competences than is the EU's stillborn judicial principle of subsidiarity. In similarly Calhounian fashion, a bottom-up procedure of constitutional amendment originating in the units is further proposed as a way of establishing unit acquiescence to greater supranationalism.en_UK
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherTaylor and Francis-
dc.relationGlencross A (2008) Consensus to Contestation: Reconfiguring Democratic Representation in the European Union in the Light of 19th Century United States Democratization, Democratization, 15 (1), pp. 123-141.-
dc.rightsThe publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.-
dc.subjectEuropean Union democratizationen_UK
dc.subjectsupranationalismen_UK
dc.subjectrepresentationen_UK
dc.subjectJohn C. Calhounen_UK
dc.titleConsensus to Contestation: Reconfiguring Democratic Representation in the European Union in the Light of 19th Century United States Democratizationen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.rights.embargodate2999-12-31T00:00:00Z-
dc.rights.embargoreasonThe publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository therefore there is an embargo on the full text of the work.-
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13510340701770014-
dc.citation.jtitleDemocratization-
dc.citation.issn1351-0347-
dc.citation.volume15-
dc.citation.issue1-
dc.citation.spage123-
dc.citation.epage141-
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublished-
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereed-
dc.type.statusPublisher version (final published refereed version)-
dc.author.emailandrew.glencross@stir.ac.uk-
dc.contributor.affiliationPolitics-
dc.rights.embargoterms2999-12-31-
dc.rights.embargoliftdate2999-12-31-
dc.identifier.isi000207519600007-
Appears in Collections:History and Politics Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Glencross_Consensus_to_Contestation_Democratization.pdf167.04 kBAdobe PDFUnder Permanent Embargo    Request a copy


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.