Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/19575
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHope, Simonen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2014-03-24T23:18:24Z-
dc.date.available2014-03-24T23:18:24Zen_UK
dc.date.issued2013-02en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/19575-
dc.description.abstractIt is sometimes held that modern institutionally-focussed conceptions of social justice are lacking in one essential respect: they ignore the importance of civic friendship or solidarity. It is also, typically simultaneously, held that Aristotle's thought provides a fertile ground for elucidating an account of civic friendship. I argue, first, that Aristotle is no help on this score: he has no conception of distinctively civic friendship. I then go on to argue that the Kantian distinction between perfect and imperfect duties is more useful than talk of civic friendship in capturing the non-institutional demands of social justice.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherSpringeren_UK
dc.relationHope S (2013) Friendship, Justice, and Aristotle: Some Reasons to Be Sceptical. Res Publica, 19 (1), pp. 37-52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11158-012-9205-3en_UK
dc.rightsThe publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserveden_UK
dc.subjectAristotleen_UK
dc.subjectCivic friendshipen_UK
dc.subjectImperfect dutyen_UK
dc.subjectphiliaen_UK
dc.subjectSolidarityen_UK
dc.titleFriendship, Justice, and Aristotle: Some Reasons to Be Scepticalen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.rights.embargodate2999-12-29en_UK
dc.rights.embargoreason[Res Publica 2013.pdf] The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository therefore there is an embargo on the full text of the work.en_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11158-012-9205-3en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleRes Publicaen_UK
dc.citation.issn1356-4765en_UK
dc.citation.volume19en_UK
dc.citation.issue1en_UK
dc.citation.spage37en_UK
dc.citation.epage52en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.author.emailsimonjames.hope@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationPhilosophyen_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-84872304786en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid727139en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2013-02-28en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2014-03-21en_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorHope, Simon|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2999-12-29en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved||en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameRes Publica 2013.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source1356-4765en_UK
Appears in Collections:Law and Philosophy Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Res Publica 2013.pdfFulltext - Published Version185.84 kBAdobe PDFUnder Embargo until 2999-12-29    Request a copy


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.