Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/1882
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorShepherd, Ashley-
dc.contributor.authorGlenesk, Ann-
dc.contributor.authorNiven, Catherine-
dc.contributor.authorMackenzie, Joan-
dc.date.accessioned2014-09-14T13:34:10Z-
dc.date.issued2006-06-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/1882-
dc.description.abstractSummary Objective to conduct a randomised-controlled trial to investigate the effectiveness of two heel-prick devices (Tenderfoot and Genie Lancet) used in the newborn-baby screening test. Design a randomised-controlled trial. Participants and setting the homes of 340 healthy term newborn babies discharged from the maternity unit of Stirling Royal Infirmary, Scotland. Data were collected between April and November 2003. Interventions babies were randomly allocated to be tested with either the Tenderfoot or Genie Lancet heel-prick device. Measurements primary study outcomes include (1) quality of the blood sample; (2) time taken to collect the sample; (3) number of heel pricks required to take the sample; (4) whether squeezing of heel was required; (5) pain expressed by the baby; and (6) presence of bruising. A potential intervening variable was the experience of the midwife. Findings on all outcomes, the Tenderfoot device was more effective than the Genie Lancet. Experienced midwives were more efficient in sample collection. Key Conclusions this study shows that the Tenderfoot device saves significant time for midwifery staff, improves baby care and reduces the need for more than one heel prick at each test, making it superior to the Genie Lancet device.en_UK
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherElsevier-
dc.relationShepherd A, Glenesk A, Niven C & Mackenzie J (2006) A Scottish study of heel-prick blood sampling in newborn babies, Midwifery, 22 (2), pp. 158-168.-
dc.rightsThe publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author; you can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.-
dc.subjectneonatal screeningen_UK
dc.subjectblood samplingen_UK
dc.subjectmidwifery careen_UK
dc.subject.lcshNeonatal hematology-
dc.subject.lcshPain physiopathology-
dc.titleA Scottish study of heel-prick blood sampling in newborn babiesen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.rights.embargodate2999-12-31T00:00:00Z-
dc.rights.embargoreasonThe publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository therefore there is an embargo on the full text of the work.-
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2005.07.002-
dc.citation.jtitleMidwifery-
dc.citation.issn0266-6138-
dc.citation.volume22-
dc.citation.issue2-
dc.citation.spage158-
dc.citation.epage168-
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublished-
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereed-
dc.type.statusPublisher version (final published refereed version)-
dc.author.emailas10@stir.ac.uk-
dc.citation.date28/12/2005-
dc.contributor.affiliationHS Research - Stirling-
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Stirling-
dc.contributor.affiliationNMAHP Research-
dc.contributor.affiliationInstitute of Medical Genetics-
dc.rights.embargoterms2999-12-31-
dc.rights.embargoliftdate2999-12-31-
dc.identifier.isi000238293700008-
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Shepherd - A Scottish study of heel prick blood sampling in newborn babies.pdf293.38 kBAdobe PDFUnder Permanent Embargo    Request a copy


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.