Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/18495
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMillar, Alanen_UK
dc.contributor.editorDutant J, Jen_UK
dc.contributor.editorFassio, Den_UK
dc.contributor.editorMeylan, Aen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2017-10-09T22:28:44Z-
dc.date.available2017-10-09T22:28:44Z-
dc.date.issued2014en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/18495-
dc.description.abstractThe aim is (i) to outline an account what it is to grasp the meaning of a predicative term, and (ii) to draw on that account in an attempt to shed light on what the normativity of meaning might amount to. Central to the account is that grasping the meaning of a predicative term is a practical matter—it is knowing how to use it correctly in a way that implicates having an ability to use it correctly. This calls for an examination of what it is to use a term correctly. Two quite different types of correctness are liable to be conflated. Sections 2 and 3 show why they must be kept apart. Sections 4 and 5 consider how correctness of the second type might be conceived within a practice-theoretic framework and how that framework might make sense of the idea that meaning is essentially normative. The concluding section responds to an objection.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherUniversity of Genevaen_UK
dc.relationMillar A (2014) How Meaning Might Be Normative. In: Dutant J J, Fassio D & Meylan A (eds.) Liber Amicorum Pascal Engel. Geneva, Switzerland: University of Geneva, pp. 798-817. http://www.unige.ch/lettres/philo/publications/engel/liberamicorumen_UK
dc.rightsCopyright is retained by the author. Proper attribution of authorship and correct citation details should be given. The original article can be found at: http://www.unige.ch/lettres/philo/publications/engel/liberamicorum/millar.pdfen_UK
dc.subjectcorrectness of applicationen_UK
dc.subjectcorrectness as use in keeping with meaningen_UK
dc.subjectmeaningen_UK
dc.subjectnormativityen_UK
dc.subjectoccasion-sensitivityen_UK
dc.subjectpractices.en_UK
dc.titleHow Meaning Might Be Normativeen_UK
dc.typePart of book or chapter of booken_UK
dc.citation.spage798en_UK
dc.citation.epage817en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.identifier.urlhttp://www.unige.ch/lettres/philo/publications/engel/liberamicorumen_UK
dc.author.emailalan.millar@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.btitleLiber Amicorum Pascal Engelen_UK
dc.publisher.addressGeneva, Switzerlanden_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationPhilosophyen_UK
dc.identifier.wtid657673en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2014-12-31en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2014-01-31en_UK
rioxxterms.typeBook chapteren_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorMillar, Alan|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.contributorDutant J, J|en_UK
local.rioxx.contributorFassio, D|en_UK
local.rioxx.contributorMeylan, A|en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2014-12-31en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved||2014-12-31en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved|2014-12-31|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameHow meaning might be normative.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
Appears in Collections:Law and Philosophy Book Chapters and Sections

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
How meaning might be normative.pdfFulltext - Published Version137.8 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.