Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles
Peer Review Status: Refereed
Title: Supporting 'work-related goals' rather than 'return to work' after cancer? A systematic review and meta-synthesis of 25 qualitative studies
Author(s): Wells, Mary
Williams, Brian
Firnigl, Danielle
Lang, Heidi
Coyle, Joanne
Kroll, Thilo
MacGillivray, Steve
Contact Email:
Keywords: cancer
systematic review
Issue Date: Jun-2013
Date Deposited: 15-Jan-2014
Citation: Wells M, Williams B, Firnigl D, Lang H, Coyle J, Kroll T & MacGillivray S (2013) Supporting 'work-related goals' rather than 'return to work' after cancer? A systematic review and meta-synthesis of 25 qualitative studies. Psycho-Oncology, 22 (6), pp. 1208-1219.
Abstract: Background: This study aimed to systematically review and synthesise qualitative studies of employment and cancer. Methods: A rigorous systematic review and meta-synthesis process was followed. A total of 13 233 papers were retrieved from eight databases; 69 were deemed relevant following title and abstract appraisal. Four further publications were identified via contact with key authors. Screening of full texts resulted in the retention of 25 publications from six countries, which were included in the synthesis. Results: Studies consistently indicate that for people with cancer, ‘work' forms a central basis for self-identity and self-esteem, provides financial security, forms and maintains social relationships, and represents an individual's abilities, talents and health. Work is therefore more than paid employment. Its importance to individuals rests on the relative value survivors place on these constituent functions. The desirability, importance and subsequent interpretation of individuals' experience of ‘return to work' appears to be influenced by the ways in which cancer affects these functions or goals of ‘work'. Our synthesis draws these complex elements into a heuristic model to help illustrate and communicate these inter-relationships. Conclusion: The concept of ‘return to work' may be overly simplistic, and as a result, misleading. The proposed benefits previously ascribed to ‘return to work' may only be achieved through consideration of the specific meaning and role of work to the individual. Interventions to address work-related issues need to be person-centred, acknowledging the work-related outcomes that are important to the individual. A conceptual and operational shift towards supporting survivors to identify and achieve their ‘work-related goals' may be more appropriate.
DOI Link: 10.1002/pon.3148
Rights: The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.
Licence URL(s):

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Wells supporting work related goals 2013.pdfFulltext - Published Version373.48 kBAdobe PDFUnder Permanent Embargo    Request a copy

Note: If any of the files in this item are currently embargoed, you can request a copy directly from the author by clicking the padlock icon above. However, this facility is dependent on the depositor still being contactable at their original email address.

This item is protected by original copyright

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.