Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1893/1828
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Wells, Vaughan T. | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2009-11-27T09:22:06Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2009-11-27T09:22:06Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 1997 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1893/1828 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Until quite recently it has been argued that the Scottish Reformation of 1560 removed the trappings of Catholicism from the kirk, but retained the old machinery of ecclesiastical government. Since the 1970s, however, this notion has been placed under increasing pressure by an alternative interpretation which suggests the Reformation rejected episcopal government in favour of a conciliar form of kirk polity. This study, by adopting as its basis the more recent interpretation of the Reformation noted above, proposes the view that the genesis of the presbyterian polity of c. 1580 lies in the thought and intent of the reformers of 1560. The prevalent historiographical view that the hybrid polity of 'bishop-in-presbytery (established in 1610) represented a popular restoration - rather than a stoutly resisted introduction - of an erastian episcopate is therefore challenged. In particular, resistance to the new regime emanated from the lairds, merchants and professional classes of Scottish society, and thus the role of this 'middling group in supporting presbyterianism features prominently in this work. The role of women in the events of the period is likewise discussed, as historiography (in Scotland at least) has neglected their important contribution to the maintenance of resistance during these key years. The thought and actions of two prominent Scottish presbyterian exiles - Alexander Leighton and Robert Durie - worried the king on his English doorstep, and the contribution which these two men made to covenanting thought and resistance, particularly in the 1620s and 1630s, is also examined. Archibald Johnston of Wariston played a major role in the revolution of 1637, and the motivations which led him to become the architect of revolution in 1637 are examined. The overall theme of the thesis is one of continuity of thought and resistance, and thus the thesis looks finally in detail at the nature and process of presbyterian protest and petition from c. 1580 to 1637. | en |
dc.language.iso | en | en |
dc.publisher | University of Stirling | en |
dc.subject.lcsh | Reformation Scotland | en |
dc.subject.lcsh | Reformation Scotland | en |
dc.title | The origins of covenanting thought and resistance : c.1580-1638 | en |
dc.type | Thesis or Dissertation | en |
dc.type.qualificationlevel | Doctoral | en |
dc.type.qualificationname | Doctor of Philosophy | en |
dc.contributor.affiliation | School of Arts and Humanities | - |
dc.contributor.affiliation | History and Politics | - |
Appears in Collections: | History and Politics eTheses |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
OriginsOfCovenantingThoughtAndResistance.pdf | 29.27 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
This item is protected by original copyright |
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.