Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/18224
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBeattie, Michelleen_UK
dc.contributor.authorLauder, Williamen_UK
dc.contributor.authorAtherton, Iainen_UK
dc.contributor.authorMurphy, Douglasen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2018-04-25T23:49:19Z-
dc.date.available2018-04-25T23:49:19Z-
dc.date.issued2014-01en_UK
dc.identifier.other4en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/18224-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Improving and sustaining the quality of care in hospitals is an intractable and persistent challenge. The patients' experience of the quality of hospital care can provide insightful feedback to enable clinical teams to direct quality improvement efforts in areas where they are most needed. Yet, patient experience is often marginalised in favour of aspects of care that are easier to quantify (for example, waiting time). Attempts to measure patient experience have been hindered by a proliferation of instruments using various outcome measures with varying degrees of psychometric development and testing. Methods: We will conduct a systematic review and utility critique of instruments used to measure patient experience of health care quality in hospitals. The databases Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Psychological Information (Psych Info) and Web of Knowledge will be searched from inception until end November 2013. Search strategies will include the key words; patient, adult, hospital, secondary care, questionnaires, instruments, health care surveys, experience, satisfaction and patient opinion in various combinations. We will contact experts in the field of measuring patient experience and scrutinise all secondary references. A reviewer will apply an inclusion criteria scale to all titles and abstracts. A second reviewer will apply the inclusion criteria scale to a random 10% selection. Two reviewers will independently evaluate the methodological rigour of the testing of the instruments using the Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) checklist. Disagreements will be resolved through consensus. Instruments will be critiqued and grouped using van der Vleuten's utility index. We will present a narrative synthesis on the utility of all instruments and make recommendations for instrument selection in practice. Discussion: This systematic review of the utility of instruments to measure patient experience of hospital quality care will aid clinicians, managers and policy makers to select an instrument fit for purpose. Importantly, appropriate instrument selection will provide a mechanism for patients' voices to be heard on the quality of care they receive in hospitals.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherBioMed Central Ltden_UK
dc.relationBeattie M, Lauder W, Atherton I & Murphy D (2014) Instruments to measure patient experience of health care quality in hospitals: a systematic review protocol. Systematic Reviews, 3, Art. No.: 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-3-4en_UK
dc.rights© 2014 Beattie et al. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.en_UK
dc.titleInstruments to measure patient experience of health care quality in hospitals: a systematic review protocolen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/2046-4053-3-4en_UK
dc.identifier.pmid24387141en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleSystematic Reviewsen_UK
dc.citation.issn2046-4053en_UK
dc.citation.volume3en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.author.emailmichelle.beattie@uhi.ac.uken_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationHealth Sciences Post Qual - Highland - LEGACYen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationHealth Sciences Health - Stirling - LEGACYen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationHealth Sciences Research - Highland - LEGACYen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Dundeeen_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-84907275612en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid886822en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2014-01-09en_UK
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Systematic Reviews 2014.pdfFulltext - Published Version372.43 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.