1. STORRE
  2. Faculty of Arts and Humanities
  3. Law and Philosophy
  4. Law and Philosophy Journal Articles
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/17948
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorYu, Hong-Linen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2013-12-20T23:16:57Z-
dc.date.available2013-12-20T23:16:57Zen_UK
dc.date.issued2009en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/17948-
dc.description.abstractExamines mediation in Taiwan in light of a 2007 Scottish civil justice review recommending the use of mediation as part of the Scottish civil litigation system and citing Taiwan as a jurisdiction where mediation has successfully reduced the courts' workloads. Outlines the basic principles and rules of mediation. Analyses its various forms in Taiwan, focusing on court-annexed mediation. Evaluates the success of mediation in achieving settlement. Considers whether the system could successfully be adopted in Scotland. Presents the answers to the author's survey of 100 Taiwanese lawyers on their experience of mediation.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherSweet and Maxwellen_UK
dc.relationYu H (2009) Court Annexed Mediation. Civil Justice Quarterly, 28 (4), pp. 515-550.en_UK
dc.rightsThe publisher has not yet responded to our queries therefore this work cannot be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserveden_UK
dc.subjectCivil procedureen_UK
dc.subjectMediationen_UK
dc.subjectScotlanden_UK
dc.subjectTaiwanen_UK
dc.titleCourt Annexed Mediationen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.rights.embargodate3000-12-01en_UK
dc.rights.embargoreason[Hong-Lin Yu CJQ 2009.pdf] The publisher has not yet responded to our queries. This work cannot be made publicly available in this Repository therefore there is an embargo on the full text of the work.en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleCivil Justice Quarterlyen_UK
dc.citation.issn0261-9261en_UK
dc.citation.volume28en_UK
dc.citation.issue4en_UK
dc.citation.spage515en_UK
dc.citation.epage550en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.author.emailh.l.yu@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationLawen_UK
dc.identifier.wtid707791en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2009-12-31en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2013-12-20en_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorYu, Hong-Lin|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate3000-12-01en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved||en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameHong-Lin Yu CJQ 2009.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source0261-9261en_UK
Appears in Collections:Law and Philosophy Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Hong-Lin Yu CJQ 2009.pdfFulltext - Published Version725.31 kBAdobe PDFUnder Embargo until 3000-12-01    Request a copy


This item is protected by original copyright

View License
Show simple item record


Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.