1. STORRE
  2. Faculty of Arts and Humanities
  3. Law and Philosophy
  4. Law and Philosophy Journal Articles
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/17942
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorYu, Hong-Linen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2013-12-20T23:11:29Z-
dc.date.available2013-12-20T23:11:29Zen_UK
dc.date.issued2009en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/17942-
dc.description.abstractReviews the importance of judicial immunity from negligence actions in the UK and US, considers the extent to which such immunity also extends to arbitrators and reflects on the basis for such an extension. Evaluates the possible contractual basis for arbitrator immunity under an agency relationship with the parties and the arguments for arbitrator immunity based upon their quasi-juridical role. Assesses the extent to which the theories are borne out by UK and US cases involving questions of arbitrator immunity.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherSweet and Maxwellen_UK
dc.relationYu H (2009) Who is an arbitrator? A study into the issue of immunity. International Arbitration Law Review, 12 (2), pp. 3-10.en_UK
dc.rightsThe publisher has not yet responded to our queries therefore this work cannot be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserveden_UK
dc.subjectAgencyen_UK
dc.subjectArbitratorsen_UK
dc.subjectComparative lawen_UK
dc.subjectImmunity from suiten_UK
dc.subjectInternational commercial arbitrationen_UK
dc.subjectJudicial immunityen_UK
dc.subjectNegligenceen_UK
dc.subjectUnited Statesen_UK
dc.titleWho is an arbitrator? A study into the issue of immunityen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.rights.embargodate3000-12-01en_UK
dc.rights.embargoreason[Hong-Lin Yu Int ALR 2009.pdf] The publisher has not yet responded to our queries. This work cannot be made publicly available in this Repository therefore there is an embargo on the full text of the work.en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleInternational Arbitration Law Reviewen_UK
dc.citation.issn1367-8272en_UK
dc.citation.volume12en_UK
dc.citation.issue2en_UK
dc.citation.spage3en_UK
dc.citation.epage10en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.author.emailh.l.yu@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.description.notesCases cited: Sutcliffe v Thackrah [1974] A.C. 727 (HL)en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationLawen_UK
dc.identifier.wtid707781en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2009-12-31en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2013-12-20en_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorYu, Hong-Lin|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate3000-12-01en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved||en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameHong-Lin Yu Int ALR 2009.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source1367-8272en_UK
Appears in Collections:Law and Philosophy Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Hong-Lin Yu Int ALR 2009.pdfFulltext - Published Version327.69 kBAdobe PDFUnder Embargo until 3000-12-01    Request a copy


This item is protected by original copyright

View License
Show simple item record


Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.