Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/1648
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHundley, Vanoraen_UK
dc.contributor.authorTucker, Janeten_UK
dc.contributor.authorvan Teijlingen, Edwinen_UK
dc.contributor.authorKiger, Aliceen_UK
dc.contributor.authorIreland, Jillian Men_UK
dc.contributor.authorHarris, Fiona Margareten_UK
dc.contributor.authorFarmer, Janeen_UK
dc.contributor.authorCaldow, Janen_UK
dc.contributor.authorBryers, Helenen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2018-04-24T00:24:31Z-
dc.date.available2018-04-24T00:24:31Z-
dc.date.issued2007-08en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/1648-
dc.description.abstractIntroduction – Rising health care costs and the need to consolidate expertise in tertiary services have led to the centralisation of services. In the UK the result has been that many rural maternity units have become midwife-led. A key consideration is that midwives have the skills to competently and confidently provide maternity services in rural areas, which may be geographically isolated and where the midwife may only see a small number of pregnant women each year. Our objective was to compare the views of midwives in rural and urban settings regarding their competence and confidence with respect to ‘competencies’ identified as being those which all professionals should have in order to provide effective and safe care for low-risk women. Method – This was a comparative questionnaire survey involving a stratified sample of remote and rural maternity units and an ad hoc comparison group of three urban maternity units in Scotland. Questionnaires were sent to 82 midwives working in remote and rural areas and 107 midwives working in urban hospitals with midwife-led units. Results – The response rate from midwives in rural settings was considerably higher (85%) than from midwives in the urban areas (60%). Although the proportion of midwives who reported that they were competent was broadly similar in the two groups, there were some significant differences regarding specific competencies. Midwives in the rural group were more likely to report competence for breech delivery (p=0.001), while more urban midwives reported competence in skills such as intravenous fluid replacement (pen_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherRural and Remote Health / The Australian Rural Health Education Network (ARHEN)en_UK
dc.relationHundley V, Tucker J, van Teijlingen E, Kiger A, Ireland JM, Harris FM, Farmer J, Caldow J & Bryers H (2007) Midwives' competence: is it affected by working in a rural location?. Rural and Remote Health, 7 (3), p. 764. http://www.rrh.org.au/articles/showarticlenew.asp?ArticleID=764en_UK
dc.rightsPublisher statement: "© VA Hundley, JS Tucker, E van Teijlingen, A Kiger, JC Ireland, F Harris, J Farmer, JL Caldow, H Bryers, 2007. A licence to publish this material has been given to ARHEN http://www.rrh.org.au".; First published in Rural and Remote Health [http://www.rrh.org.au].en_UK
dc.subjectclinical competenceen_UK
dc.subjectmidwiferyen_UK
dc.subjectrural health servicesen_UK
dc.subjectquestionnaire surveyen_UK
dc.subjectRural health services Great Britainen_UK
dc.subjectClinical competenceen_UK
dc.subjectMidwives Great Britainen_UK
dc.titleMidwives' competence: is it affected by working in a rural location?en_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.pmid17691856en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleRural and Remote Healthen_UK
dc.citation.issn1445-6354en_UK
dc.citation.volume7en_UK
dc.citation.issue3en_UK
dc.citation.spage764en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.identifier.urlhttp://www.rrh.org.au/articles/showarticlenew.asp?ArticleID=764en_UK
dc.author.emailfiona.harris@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Stirlingen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Aberdeenen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Aberdeenen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Aberdeenen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationRobert Gordon Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNMAHPen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUHI Millennium Instituteen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Aberdeenen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNHS Highlanden_UK
dc.identifier.wtid892194en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0003-3258-5624en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2007-08-31en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2009-10-01en_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorHundley, Vanora|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorTucker, Janet|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorvan Teijlingen, Edwin|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorKiger, Alice|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorIreland, Jillian M|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorHarris, Fiona Margaret|0000-0003-3258-5624en_UK
local.rioxx.authorFarmer, Jane|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorCaldow, Jan|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorBryers, Helen|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2009-10-01en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved|2009-10-01|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameHundley 2007.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source1445-6354en_UK
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Hundley 2007.pdfFulltext - Published Version208.75 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.