Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/16016
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorShephard, Mark-
dc.contributor.authorCairney, Paul-
dc.date.accessioned2013-07-26T23:39:38Z-
dc.date.issued2004-12-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/16016-
dc.description.abstractThe study of administrations and ministers and their relationships with UK Parliaments has tended to focus on the issues of accountability and responsibility, levels of legislative dissent or broad performance indicators supported by anecdotal examples. This paper addresses the lack of systematic analysis of executive/legislative relations in the policy-making process by examining the dominance of different administrations and ministers in the Scottish Parliament. Two questions are addressed. First, is there any variance in the legislative dominance of different administrations in the parliamentary arena? Second, do individual ministers make a difference to the degree of policy dominance? Controlling for both initial authorship and quality of amendments to Executive policy, we analyse the nature and extent of Executive dominance during the legislative process of the First Session of the Scottish Parliament. We find some evidence to suggest that Executive dominance varies both by administration and by individual minister.en_UK
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell-
dc.relationShephard M & Cairney P (2004) Consensual or Dominant Relationships with Parliament? A Comparison of Administrations and Ministers in Scotland, Public Administration, 82 (4), pp. 831-855.-
dc.rightsThe publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.-
dc.titleConsensual or Dominant Relationships with Parliament? A Comparison of Administrations and Ministers in Scotlanden_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.rights.embargodate2999-12-31T00:00:00Z-
dc.rights.embargoreasonThe publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository therefore there is an embargo on the full text of the work.-
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0033-3298.2004.00421.x-
dc.citation.jtitlePublic Administration-
dc.citation.issn0033-3298-
dc.citation.volume82-
dc.citation.issue4-
dc.citation.spage831-
dc.citation.epage855-
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublished-
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereed-
dc.type.statusPublisher version (final published refereed version)-
dc.author.emailp.a.cairney@stir.ac.uk-
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Strathclyde-
dc.contributor.affiliationPolitics-
dc.rights.embargoterms2999-12-31-
dc.rights.embargoliftdate2999-12-31-
dc.identifier.isi000225579100003-
Appears in Collections:History and Politics Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
CONSENSUAL OR DOMINANT.pdf163.94 kBAdobe PDFUnder Permanent Embargo    Request a copy


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.