Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/16007
Appears in Collections:History and Politics Journal Articles
Peer Review Status: Refereed
Title: Does Devolution Make a Difference? Legislative Output and Policy Divergence in Scotland
Author(s): Keating, Michael
Stevenson, Linda
Cairney, Paul
Taylor, Katherine
Contact Email: p.a.cairney@stir.ac.uk
Issue Date: Sep-2003
Date Deposited: 26-Jul-2013
Citation: Keating M, Stevenson L, Cairney P & Taylor K (2003) Does Devolution Make a Difference? Legislative Output and Policy Divergence in Scotland. Journal of Legislative Studies, 9 (3), pp. 110-139. https://doi.org/10.1080/1357233042000246882
Abstract: Devolution provides large scope for Scotland to make its own policy. Primary legislation is one measure of this. Scottish legislation before devolution tended to replicate measures for the rest of the United Kingdom, with differences of style. Scottish legislation in the first four-year term of the Parliament shows a big increase in output. There is an autonomous sphere, in which Scotland has gone its own way without reference to the rest of the UK. In other areas, there is evidence of joint or parallel policy-making, with Scottish legislation meeting the same goals by different means. Finally there is a sphere in which Scottish legislation is essentially the same as that in England and Wales. Sewel motions have not been used to impose policy uniformity on Scotland. There is evidence that devolution has shifted influence both vertically, between the UK and Scottish levels, and horizontally, within a Scottish legislative system that has been opened up.
DOI Link: 10.1080/1357233042000246882
Rights: This is an Author's Accepted Manuscript of an article published in The Journal of Legislative Studies, Volume 9, Issue 3, 2003, pp.110-139, copyright Taylor & Francis, available online at: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/1357233042000246882

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Does devolution make a difference Keating et al 2003.pdfFulltext - Accepted Version345.8 kBAdobe PDFView/Open



This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.