Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/16005
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorEbert, Philipen_UK
dc.contributor.authorRobertson, Simonen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2013-10-22T23:06:36Z-
dc.date.available2013-10-22T23:06:36Z-
dc.date.issued2013-09en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/16005-
dc.description.abstractMountaineering is a dangerous activity. For many mountaineers, part of its very attraction is the risk, the thrill of danger. Yet mountaineers are often regarded as reckless or even irresponsible for risking their lives. In this paper, we offer a defence of risk-taking in mountaineering. Our discussion is organised around the fact that mountaineers and non-mountaineers often disagree about how risky mountaineering really is. We hope to cast some light on the nature of this disagreement – and to argue that mountaineering may actually be worthwhile because of the risks it involves. Section 1 introduces the disagreement and, in doing so, separates out several different notions of risk. Sections 2–4 then consider some explanations of the disagreement, showing how a variety of phenomena can skew people’s risk judgements. Section 5 then surveys some recent statistics, to see whether these illuminate how risky mountaineering is. In light of these considerations, however, we suggest that the disagreement is best framed not simply in terms of how risky mountaineering is but whether the risks it does involve are justified. The remainder of the paper, sections 6–9, argues that risk-taking in mountaineering often is justified – and, moreover, that mountaineering can itself be justified (in part) by and because of the risks it involves.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherCambridge University Pressen_UK
dc.relationEbert P & Robertson S (2013) A Plea for Risk. O'Hear A (Editor) Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement, 73, pp. 45-64. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1358246113000271.en_UK
dc.rightsPublished in Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements, Volume 73, October 2013, pp. 45-64, published by Cambridge University Press. Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1358246113000271en_UK
dc.subjectRisk, Mountaineering, Philosophy of Sporten_UK
dc.subjectMountaineeringen_UK
dc.subjectMountaineering Psychological aspectsen_UK
dc.subjectExtreme sportsen_UK
dc.subjectRisk-taking (Psychology)en_UK
dc.titleA Plea for Risken_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1017/S1358246113000271en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleRoyal Institute of Philosophy Supplementen_UK
dc.citation.issn1755-3555en_UK
dc.citation.issn1358-2461en_UK
dc.citation.volume73en_UK
dc.citation.spage45en_UK
dc.citation.epage64en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.contributor.funderArts and Humanities Research Councilen_UK
dc.author.emailp.a.ebert@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date21/08/2013en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationPhilosophyen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationCardiff Universityen_UK
dc.identifier.wtid689840en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-3730-0600en_UK
dc.date.firstcompliantdepositdate2013-07-26en_UK
dc.relation.funderprojectEarly Career Fellowship - Frege's Platonism & Platonism in mathematics todayen_UK
dc.relation.funderrefAH/J00233X/1en_UK
Appears in Collections:Law and Philosophy Book Chapters and Sections

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
ApleaforRisk_published.pdfFulltext - Published Version523.08 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.