Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/15956
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCairney, Paul-
dc.date.accessioned2013-07-25T23:14:55Z-
dc.date.available2013-07-25T23:14:55Z-
dc.date.issued2008-09-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/15956-
dc.description.abstractThe term ‘policy style' simply means the way that governments make and implement policy. Yet, the term ‘British policy style' may be confusing since it has the potential to relate to British exceptionalism or European convergence. Lijphart's important contribution identifies the former. It sets up a simple distinction between policy styles in majoritarian and consensual democracies and portrays British policy-making as top down and different from a consensual European approach. In contrast, Richardson identifies a common ‘European policy style'. This suggests that although the political structures of each country vary, they share a ‘standard operating procedure' based on two factors - an incremental approach to policy and an attempt to reach a consensus with interest groups rather than impose decisions. This article extends these arguments to British politics since devolution. It questions the assumption that policy styles are diverging within Britain. Although consultation in the devolved territories may appear to be more consensual, they are often contrasted with a caricature of the UK process based on atypical examples of top-down policy-making. While there may be a different ‘feel' to participation in Scotland and Wales, a similar logic of consultation and bureaucratic accommodation exists in the UK. This suggests that, although devolution has made a difference, a British (or European) policy style can still be identified.en_UK
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherPalgrave Macmillan-
dc.relationCairney P (2008) Has Devolution Changed the 'British Policy Style'?, British Politics, 3 (3), pp. 350-372.-
dc.rightsThis is a post-peer-review, pre-copyedit version of an article published in British Politics. The definitive publisher-authenticated version British Politics (2008) 3, 350–372. doi:10.1057/bp.2008.15 is available online at: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/bp/journal/v3/n3/abs/bp200815a.html-
dc.subjectpolicy stylesen_UK
dc.subjectdevolutionen_UK
dc.subjectmajoritarian-consensusen_UK
dc.subjectconsultationen_UK
dc.subjectinterest groupsen_UK
dc.subject.lcshDecentralization in government Great Britain-
dc.subject.lcshRegionalism Great Britain History-
dc.subject.lcshConstitutional law Great Britain-
dc.titleHas Devolution Changed the 'British Policy Style'?en_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1057/bp.2008.15-
dc.citation.jtitleBritish Politics-
dc.citation.issn1746-918X-
dc.citation.volume3-
dc.citation.issue3-
dc.citation.spage350-
dc.citation.epage372-
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublished-
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereed-
dc.type.statusPost-print (author final draft post-refereeing)-
dc.author.emailp.a.cairney@stir.ac.uk-
dc.contributor.affiliationPolitics-
dc.identifier.isi000207744600005-
Appears in Collections:History and Politics Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Has devolution changed the british policy style 2008.pdf393.25 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.