Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/1581
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTucker, Janeten_UK
dc.contributor.authorHundley, Vanoraen_UK
dc.contributor.authorKiger, Aliceen_UK
dc.contributor.authorBryers, Helenen_UK
dc.contributor.authorCaldow, Janen_UK
dc.contributor.authorFarmer, Janeen_UK
dc.contributor.authorHarris, Fiona Margareten_UK
dc.contributor.authorIreland, Jillian Men_UK
dc.contributor.authorvan Teijlingen, Edwinen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2014-09-14T01:17:38Z-
dc.date.available2014-09-14T01:17:38Z-
dc.date.issued2005-02en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/1581-
dc.description.abstractObjectives: To explore staff views on their roles, skills and training to deliver high quality and local intrapartum services in remote and rural settings against national recommendations. Design: Interview and postal survey. Setting: A stratified representative sample of remote and rural maternity units in Scotland (December 2002 to May 2003). Participants: Staff proportionally representative of professional groups involved in maternity care. Results: Staff interviews took place at 11 units (response rate 93%). A subsequent postal survey included the interview sample and staff in a further 11 units (response rate 78%). Medical specialisation, workforce issues, and proposed regulatory evaluation of competencies linked to throughput raised concerns about the sustainability and safety of services, particularly for ‘‘generalists’’ in rural maternity care teams and for medical cover in small district general hospitals with large rural catchments. Risk assessment and decision making to transfer were seen as central for effective rural practice and these were influenced by rural context. Staff self-reported competence and confidence varied according to procedure, but noted service change appeared to be underway ahead of their preparedness. Self-reported competence in managing obstetric emergencies was surprisingly high, with the caveat that they were not independently assessed in this study. Staff with access to video conference technology reported low actual use although there was enthusiasm about its potential use. Conclusions: Considerable uncertainties remain around staffing models and training to maintain maternity care team skills and competencies. Further research is required to test how this will impact on safety, appropriateness, and access and acceptability to rural communities.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherBMJ Publishing Groupen_UK
dc.relationTucker J, Hundley V, Kiger A, Bryers H, Caldow J, Farmer J, Harris FM, Ireland JM & van Teijlingen E (2005) Sustainable maternity services in remote and rural Scotland? A qualitative survey of staff views on required skills, competencies and training. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 14 (1), pp. 34-40. http://qshc.bmj.com/cgi/content/abstract/14/1/34; https://doi.org/10.1136/qshc.2004.010561en_UK
dc.rightsPublished in Quality and Safety in Health Care. Copyright: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.en_UK
dc.subjectmidwifery educationen_UK
dc.subjectcompetencyen_UK
dc.subjectremote and rural healthen_UK
dc.subjectmixed methodsen_UK
dc.subjectMidwifery Scotlanden_UK
dc.subjectNurse Midwivesen_UK
dc.subjectNursing careen_UK
dc.titleSustainable maternity services in remote and rural Scotland? A qualitative survey of staff views on required skills, competencies and trainingen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/qshc.2004.010561en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleQuality and Safety in Health Careen_UK
dc.citation.issn1470-7934en_UK
dc.citation.issn1475-3898en_UK
dc.citation.volume14en_UK
dc.citation.issue1en_UK
dc.citation.spage34en_UK
dc.citation.epage40en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.identifier.urlhttp://qshc.bmj.com/cgi/content/abstract/14/1/34en_UK
dc.author.emailfiona.harris@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Aberdeenen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Stirlingen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Aberdeenen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNHS Highlanden_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Aberdeenen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUHI Millennium Instituteen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNMAHPen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Aberdeenen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Aberdeenen_UK
dc.identifier.wtid816777en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0003-3258-5624en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2005-02-28en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2009-08-27en_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorTucker, Janet|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorHundley, Vanora|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorKiger, Alice|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorBryers, Helen|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorCaldow, Jan|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorFarmer, Jane|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorHarris, Fiona Margaret|0000-0003-3258-5624en_UK
local.rioxx.authorIreland, Jillian M|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorvan Teijlingen, Edwin|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2009-08-27en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved|2009-08-27|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameTucker 2005.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source1475-3898en_UK
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Tucker 2005.pdfFulltext - Published Version91.49 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.