Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1893/1579
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Forbat, Liz | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | Hubbard, Gill | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | Kearney, Nora | en_UK |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-09-27T22:13:34Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2017-09-27T22:13:34Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2009-09 | en_UK |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1893/1579 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Aims and objectives. This paper explores the range of models of involvement which are drawn upon in an empirical study and which are invoked in the literature and policy. The results and discussion of the study help to excavate and explore the muddle of conceptualisations of involvement and how this leads to difficulties for practitioners, patients and managers in implementing the relevant policy. Background. Patient and public involvement has developed an important profile internationally within health and social care policy. However, its importance as a rhetorical device has not been accompanied by adequate developments in how it is operationalised. Design. Cross-sectional study, with an intervention conducted at three sites, and non-intervention measures taken at two control sites. Methods. This paper draws on an empirical study of involvement. Focus groups were conducted with a lung cancer team and people affected by cancer at five health boards across Scotland. Chief executives of each of these five health boards also took part in individual interviews. Participants were asked to describe their ideas of what involvement is and their application of it. Results. A range of ways of conceptualising involvement were apparent. Few of these moved beyond the use of patient satisfaction questionnaires. At times, troubling understandings were articulated, for example, using public meetings to communicate decisions about service closures to the public. Conclusion. The slow escalation of involvement is in part because of the myriad ways in which it is conceptualised and discussed. Thus, we conclude that one of the greatest barriers to truly integrating patient involvement into health services, policy and research is the conceptual muddle with which involvement is articulated, understood and actioned. Relevance to clinical practice. Clinicians need to be supported to seek clarity in the use and operationalisation of involvement if the agenda is to be truly adopted and strengthened. | en_UK |
dc.language.iso | en | en_UK |
dc.publisher | Wiley-Blackwell | en_UK |
dc.relation | Forbat L, Hubbard G & Kearney N (2009) Patient and public involvement: models and muddles. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 18 (18), pp. 2547-2554. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02519.x | en_UK |
dc.rights | The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author; you can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study. | en_UK |
dc.rights.uri | http://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved | en_UK |
dc.subject | nurses | en_UK |
dc.subject | nursing | en_UK |
dc.subject | patient participation | en_UK |
dc.subject | policy | en_UK |
dc.subject | qualitative study | en_UK |
dc.subject | research in practice | en_UK |
dc.subject | Nurses and nursing | en_UK |
dc.subject | Patient participation | en_UK |
dc.subject | Cancer Patients | en_UK |
dc.subject | Health education | en_UK |
dc.title | Patient and public involvement: models and muddles | en_UK |
dc.type | Journal Article | en_UK |
dc.rights.embargodate | 2999-12-31 | en_UK |
dc.rights.embargoreason | [Forbat - Patient and public involvement models and muddles.pdf] We would like to delay access to this to article and request that the 'Request from author' option be added to this paper. The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository therefore there is an embargo on the full text of the work. | en_UK |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02519.x | en_UK |
dc.identifier.pmid | 19207798 | en_UK |
dc.citation.jtitle | Journal of Clinical Nursing | en_UK |
dc.citation.issn | 1365-2702 | en_UK |
dc.citation.issn | 0962-1067 | en_UK |
dc.citation.volume | 18 | en_UK |
dc.citation.issue | 18 | en_UK |
dc.citation.spage | 2547 | en_UK |
dc.citation.epage | 2554 | en_UK |
dc.citation.publicationstatus | Published | en_UK |
dc.citation.peerreviewed | Refereed | en_UK |
dc.type.status | VoR - Version of Record | en_UK |
dc.author.email | elizabeth.forbat1@stir.ac.uk | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Cancer Care Research Centre - LEGACY | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Cancer Care Research Centre - LEGACY | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Health Sciences Research - Stirling - LEGACY | en_UK |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000268759800003 | en_UK |
dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-68949135169 | en_UK |
dc.identifier.wtid | 816230 | en_UK |
dc.contributor.orcid | 0000-0002-7218-5775 | en_UK |
dc.contributor.orcid | 0000-0003-2165-5770 | en_UK |
dc.date.accepted | 2008-05-11 | en_UK |
dcterms.dateAccepted | 2008-05-11 | en_UK |
dc.date.filedepositdate | 2009-08-25 | en_UK |
rioxxterms.type | Journal Article/Review | en_UK |
rioxxterms.version | VoR | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Forbat, Liz|0000-0002-7218-5775 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Hubbard, Gill|0000-0003-2165-5770 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Kearney, Nora| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.project | Internal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate | 2999-12-31 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.licence | http://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved|| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.filename | Forbat - Patient and public involvement models and muddles.pdf | en_UK |
local.rioxx.filecount | 1 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.source | 0962-1067 | en_UK |
Appears in Collections: | Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Forbat - Patient and public involvement models and muddles.pdf | Fulltext - Published Version | 124.3 kB | Adobe PDF | Under Permanent Embargo Request a copy |
This item is protected by original copyright |
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.