Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/15686
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRoxburgh, Michelleen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2014-09-14T03:40:35Z-
dc.date.available2014-09-14T03:40:35Z-
dc.date.issued2014-01en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/15686-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Phase 1 of this study examined student, mentor and clinical manager's perceptions of a ‘Hub and Spoke' practice learning model in year 1 of an undergraduate nursing programme. Findings from Phase 1 suggested that the model had significant educational merit in orientating students to clinical learning and emphasising the primacy of the mentor relationship in developing and supporting students. Following the students through year 2 of their programme, wherein they experienced a ‘rotational' practice learning model, which provided an opportunity to explore student perceptions of both models. Aims: To explore undergraduate nurses' perceptions of two experienced practice learning models: hub and spoke model, and the classical rotational model. In a previous study the hub and spoke model appeared to develop 1st year students' sense of belongingness, continuity and quality of practice learning, there for it was important to understand what students reported about these issues when recounting their 2nd year experience in the clinical setting that was organised according to a classical rotational model. Design: Qualitative approach utilising focus groups. Participants: 10 under-graduate student nurses at the end of 2nd year. Methods: Focus group interviews. Results: Students responded in ways that indicate they believed the experiences of year 1 had raised their faith in their ability to cope with the practice learning and educational demands of nursing. They saw themselves as being better prepared for year 2 as a result of their exposure to hubs and spokes. The study has identified traits of resilience, continued belongingness and self-confidence in orientation to learning in clinical practice in hub and spoke experienced students. Conclusions: The student nurses found the hub and spoke model valid in 1st year, whilst stating that for 2nd year the rotational model can be valid. This supports earlier findings that student nurses require a structured and supportive 1st year learning environment to enable development of resilience for subsequent years.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherElsevieren_UK
dc.relationRoxburgh M (2014) Undergraduate student nurses' perceptions of two practice learning models: A focus group study. Nurse Education Today, 34 (1), pp. 40-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2013.02.017en_UK
dc.rightsThe publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserveden_UK
dc.subjectNursingen_UK
dc.subjectStudentsen_UK
dc.subjectPractice learningen_UK
dc.subjectModelsen_UK
dc.titleUndergraduate student nurses' perceptions of two practice learning models: A focus group studyen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.rights.embargodate2999-12-18en_UK
dc.rights.embargoreason[arrticle.pdf] The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository therefore there is an embargo on the full text of the work.en_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.nedt.2013.02.017en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleNurse Education Todayen_UK
dc.citation.issn0260-6917en_UK
dc.citation.volume34en_UK
dc.citation.issue1en_UK
dc.citation.spage40en_UK
dc.citation.epage46en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.contributor.funderNHS Education for Scotlanden_UK
dc.author.emailmichelle.roxburgh@uhi.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date17/04/2013en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationHealth Sciences Post Qual - Highland - LEGACYen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000329012200009en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-84876004269en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid696005en_UK
dc.date.accepted2013-05-03en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2013-05-03en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2013-06-27en_UK
dc.relation.funderprojectThe Development, Implementation and Evaluation of Demonstration Projects of New Approaches to Providing Practice Placements in the Pre Registration Nursing Programmeen_UK
dc.relation.funderrefJ Mayoen_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorRoxburgh, Michelle|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectJ Mayo|NHS Education for Scotland|http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100010525en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2999-12-18en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved||en_UK
local.rioxx.filenamearrticle.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source0260-6917en_UK
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
arrticle.pdfFulltext - Published Version200.76 kBAdobe PDFUnder Embargo until 2999-12-18    Request a copy


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.