Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1893/15637
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Paley, John | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | Lilford, Richard J | en_UK |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-04-26T00:43:37Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2018-04-26T00:43:37Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2011-04-30 | en_UK |
dc.identifier.other | d424 | en_UK |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1893/15637 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Are qualitative and quantitative research really based on different philosophies? John Paley and Richard Lilford argue that the idea that qualitative research is constructivist should not be allowed to diffuse into medical literature unopposed. | en_UK |
dc.language.iso | en | en_UK |
dc.publisher | BMJ Publishing Group | en_UK |
dc.relation | Paley J & Lilford RJ (2011) Qualitative methods: An alternative view. BMJ, 342 (7804), pp. 956-958, Art. No.: d424. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d424 | en_UK |
dc.rights | Publisher is open-access. Open access publishing allows free access to and distribution of published articles where the author retains copyright of their work by employing a Creative Commons attribution licence. Proper attribution of authorship and correct citation details should be given. BMJ 2011; 342 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d424 (Published 9 February 2011) Cite this as: BMJ 2011;342:d424 | en_UK |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ | en_UK |
dc.subject | Social sciences Research Methodology | en_UK |
dc.title | Qualitative methods: An alternative view | en_UK |
dc.type | Journal Article | en_UK |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1136/bmj.d424 | en_UK |
dc.identifier.pmid | 21307109 | en_UK |
dc.citation.jtitle | BMJ | en_UK |
dc.citation.issn | 1756-1833 | en_UK |
dc.citation.issn | 0959-8138 | en_UK |
dc.citation.volume | 342 | en_UK |
dc.citation.issue | 7804 | en_UK |
dc.citation.spage | 956 | en_UK |
dc.citation.epage | 958 | en_UK |
dc.citation.publicationstatus | Published | en_UK |
dc.citation.peerreviewed | Refereed | en_UK |
dc.type.status | VoR - Version of Record | en_UK |
dc.author.email | j.h.paley@stir.ac.uk | en_UK |
dc.citation.date | 09/02/2011 | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Health Sciences Health - Stirling - LEGACY | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | University of Birmingham | en_UK |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000287402900014 | en_UK |
dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-79955548355 | en_UK |
dc.identifier.wtid | 887738 | en_UK |
dcterms.dateAccepted | 2011-02-09 | en_UK |
dc.date.filedepositdate | 2013-06-20 | en_UK |
rioxxterms.type | Journal Article/Review | en_UK |
rioxxterms.version | VoR | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Paley, John| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Lilford, Richard J| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.project | Internal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate | 2013-06-20 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.licence | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/|2013-06-20| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.filename | Qualitative methods alternative view.pdf | en_UK |
local.rioxx.filecount | 1 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.source | 0959-8138 | en_UK |
Appears in Collections: | Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Qualitative methods alternative view.pdf | Fulltext - Published Version | 383.42 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
This item is protected by original copyright |
A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.