|Appears in Collections:||Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles|
|Peer Review Status:||Refereed|
|Title:||Commentary: Care tactics - arguments, absences and assumptions in relational ethics|
|Citation:||Paley J (2011) Commentary: Care tactics - arguments, absences and assumptions in relational ethics. Nursing Ethics, 18 (2), pp. 243-254. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969733010393070|
|Abstract:||First paragraph: As the contributions to this special issue of Nursing Ethics imply, the ethics of care owes a debt to both Heidegger and the moral psychology of 30 years ago. Every article cites Gilligan's In a different voice, and most of them refer to the ‘relational view of the person', or to ‘relational ontology', effectively a version of Heidegger's ‘being with' after it has been passed through the blender of feminism and theology. Disappointingly, however, the interest in moral psychology appears to start and finish with Gilligan, the vast amount of work carried out in this burgeoning field since the early 1990s having been ignored. Moreover, the notion of a ‘relational ontology', as deployed by contemporary care ethicists, is rather slippery. So these are two of the themes that this commentary will consider: first, the absence of the more recent moral psychology from discussions of care ethics; and, second, the ambiguities and polarizations inherent in the idea of a relational ontology, at least as it is portrayed here.|
|Rights:||The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.|
|Care tactics.pdf||Fulltext - Published Version||201.58 kB||Adobe PDF||Under Embargo until 3000-01-01 Request a copy|
Note: If any of the files in this item are currently embargoed, you can request a copy directly from the author by clicking the padlock icon above. However, this facility is dependent on the depositor still being contactable at their original email address.
This item is protected by original copyright
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact firstname.lastname@example.org providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.