|Appears in Collections:||Literature and Languages Journal Articles|
|Peer Review Status:||Refereed|
|Title:||'Lucky this is Anonymous.' Ethnographies of reception in men’s magazines: A 'textual culture' approach|
|Keywords:||circuits of culture|
|Citation:||Benwell B (2005) 'Lucky this is Anonymous.' Ethnographies of reception in men’s magazines: A 'textual culture' approach. Discourse and Society, 16 (2), pp. 147-172. http://das.sagepub.com/content/16/2/147; https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926505049616|
|Abstract:||In this article I address the contribution that a study of reader reception might make to our understanding of the cultural meanings of the discourses to be found in and around men’s magazines. Reception is a cultural site often neglected in linguistic analyses of popular cultural texts, which are commonly treated as discrete, autonomous and ahistorical within these approaches. Conversation Analysis of unstructured interviews with magazine readers is one means of accessing contexts of reception, which, unlike many ethnographic approaches, is properly reflexive about the ontological status of its data. The drawback of a strict ethnomethodological approach, however, is its limited ability in recreating the original context of reading: the interview is arguably a situated account rather than a transparent report of reception. In order to expand the terms of ‘context’ for these interviews, therefore, the article proposes a triangulated method whereby the discourses and categories identified in talk can be intertextually linked (and indeed are sometimes intertextually indexed within the talk itself) to other communicative contexts in the circuit of culture, such as the magazine text, media debates, editorial identities and everyday talk. This ‘textual culture’1 approach to the analysis of popular culture effectively aims to analyse with ethnographic breadth and in discursive depth, the various, intersecting sites of culture within which the material text is formed - of which reception serves as the focal point for this article - and mirrors recent developments in Critical Discourse Analysis.|
|Rights:||Publisher policy allows this work to be made available in this repository. Published in Discourse Society March 2005 vol. 16 no. 2 147-172 by SAGE. The original publication is available at http://das.sagepub.com/content/16/2/147|
|2TCPAPER.pdf||Fulltext - Accepted Version||505.82 kB||Adobe PDF||View/Open|
This item is protected by original copyright
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact firstname.lastname@example.org providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.