|Appears in Collections:
|Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles
|Peer Review Status:
|'A coal face option': GPs' perspectives on the rise in antidepressant prescribing
|Macdonald, Sara R
Depression, Mental Treatment
|Macdonald SR, Morrison J, Maxwell M, Munoz-Arroyo R, Power A, Smith M, Sutton M & Wilson P (2009) 'A coal face option': GPs' perspectives on the rise in antidepressant prescribing. <i>British Journal of General Practice</i>, 59 (566), pp. 658-659. https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp09X454106
|Background: Levels of antidepressant prescribing have dramatically increased in Western countries in the last two decades.Aim: To explore GPs' views about, and explanations for, the increase in antidepressant prescribing in Scotland between 1995 and 2004.Design: Qualitative, interview study.Setting: General practices, Scotland.Participants: GPs in 30 practices (n = 63) purposively selected to reflect a range of practice characteristics and levels of antidepressant prescribing.Method: Interviews with GPs were taped and transcribed. Analysis followed a Framework Approach.Results: GPs offered a range of explanations for the rise in antidepressant prescribing in Scotland. Few doctors thought that the incidence of depression had increased, and many questioned the appropriateness of current levels of prescribing. A number of related factors were considered to have contributed to the increase. These included: the success of campaigns to raise awareness of depression; a willingness among patients to seek help; and the perceived safety of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, making it easier for GPs to manage depression in primary care. Many GPs believed that unhappiness, exacerbated by social deprivation and the breakdown of traditional social structures, was being 'medicalised' inappropriately.Conclusion: Most antidepressant prescriptions in Scotland are issued by GPs, and current policy aims to reduce levels of prescribing. To meet this aim, GPs' prescribing behaviour needs to change. The findings suggest that GPs see themselves as responders to, rather than facilitators of, change and this has obvious implications for initiatives to reduce prescribing.
|The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.
|Fulltext - Published Version
|Under Permanent Embargo Request a copy
Note: If any of the files in this item are currently embargoed, you can request a copy directly from the author by clicking the padlock icon above. However, this facility is dependent on the depositor still being contactable at their original email address.
This item is protected by original copyright
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact firstname.lastname@example.org providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.