Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWyke, Sallyen_UK
dc.contributor.authorEntwistle, Vikkien_UK
dc.contributor.authorFrance, Emmaen_UK
dc.contributor.authorHunt, Kateen_UK
dc.contributor.authorJepson, Ruthen_UK
dc.contributor.authorThompson, Andrewen_UK
dc.contributor.authorZiebland, Sue Ben_UK
dc.description.abstractFirst paragraph: Choice is at the heart of all Government health policies (1-5). The SDO's scoping review of the evidence on patient choice in the NHS, commissioned in 2004, suggested that: people want information but not necessarily for making choices; that people facing complex treatment choices often prefer decisions to be made on their behalf by a well-informed and trusted health professional; that wanting the option of choosing a distant hospital for non urgent care is limited to those situations where there is a long wait for a local hospital and there is a history of poor quality care; that wealthy and better educated people are likely to benefit most from choice; and that there is little evidence that giving people more choice will, in itself, improve quality of care (6). It is recognised that information is pivotal to people's experience of choice and self-management; to make optimal choices with confidence and to build on their existing self-management strategies people need the right information, at the right time with right support to use it (7). Lord Darzi's Next Stage Review (8) made it clear that the English NHS was to be focused as: "an NHS that gives patients and the public more information and choice, works in partnership and has quality of care at its heart" (page 7) (our emphasis). SDO 08/1710/153 was commissioned in 2005. The brief called for research to understand the types of information that people take account of when making choices, the format of information that they prefer, and whether preferences vary systematically according to socio-economic status, ethnicity, gender and age. In responding to this brief we focused on two key types of information: 'general facts' and 'personal experience' information. By 'general facts' we mean research-based information about health care interventions and the risks and outcomes associated with them; medical knowledge that reflects consensus based on what has been observed among many patients/people; and other information that is widely accepted to be both reasonably reliable and fairly broadly applicable (e.g. statements of legal requirement or policy). By 'personal experience' information we mean information about the experiences of particular individuals, as communicated by themselves or others.en_UK
dc.publisherNIHR Service Delivery and Organisation (SDO), Southamptonen_UK
dc.relationWyke S, Entwistle V, France E, Hunt K, Jepson R, Thompson A & Ziebland SB (2011) Information for choice: what people need, prefer and use - Report for the National Institute for Health Research Service Delivery and Organisation programme. National Institute for Health Research. SDO Project, 08/1710/153. NIHR Service Delivery and Organisation (SDO), Southampton.
dc.relation.ispartofseriesSDO Project, 08/1710/153en_UK
dc.rightsPublisher policy allows this work to be made available in this repository.en_UK
dc.titleInformation for choice: what people need, prefer and use - Report for the National Institute for Health Research Service Delivery and Organisation programmeen_UK
dc.typeResearch Reporten_UK
dc.contributor.sponsorNational Institute for Health Researchen_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationHealth Sciences Research - Stirling - LEGACYen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Dundeeen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationHealth Sciences Research - Stirling - LEGACYen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationInstitute for Social Marketingen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationHealth Sciences Stirlingen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Edinburghen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Oxforden_UK
rioxxterms.typeTechnical Reporten_UK
local.rioxx.authorWyke, Sally|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorEntwistle, Vikki|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorFrance, Emma|0000-0003-0876-7030en_UK
local.rioxx.authorHunt, Kate|0000-0002-5873-3632en_UK
local.rioxx.authorJepson, Ruth|0000-0002-9446-445Xen_UK
local.rioxx.authorThompson, Andrew|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorZiebland, Sue B|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Research Reports

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
France_2011_Information_for_choice.pdfFulltext - Published Version828.77 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

This item is protected by original copyright

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.