Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Social Sciences Research Reports
Peer Review Status: Refereed
Title: Evaluation of the Airdrie Sheriff Youth Court Pilot
Author(s): Barnsdale, Lee
MacRae, Rhoda
McIvor, Gill
Brown, Alison
Eley, Susan
Malloch, Margaret
Murray, Cathy
Piacentini, Laura
Popham, Frank
Walters, Reece
Contact Email:
Citation: Barnsdale L, MacRae R, McIvor G, Brown A, Eley S, Malloch M, Murray C, Piacentini L, Popham F & Walters R (2006) Evaluation of the Airdrie Sheriff Youth Court Pilot. Scottish Executive. Crime and Criminal Justice, Social Research. Scottish Executive, Social Research.
Keywords: youth crime
youth court
Issue Date: Nov-2006
Publisher: Scottish Executive, Social Research
Series/Report no.: Crime and Criminal Justice, Social Research
Abstract: A pilot Youth Court was introduced at Airdrie Sheriff Court in June 2004. Its objectives were to: • reduce the frequency and seriousness of re-offending by 16 and 17 year old offenders, particularly persistent offenders (and some 15 year olds who are referred to the court); • promote the social inclusion, citizenship and personal responsibility of these young offenders while maximising their potential; • establish fast track procedures for those young persons appearing before the Youth Court; • enhance community safety, by reducing the harm caused to individual victims of crime and providing respite to those communities which are experiencing high levels of crime; and • test the viability and usefulness of a Youth Court using existing legislation and to demonstrate whether legislative and practical improvements might be appropriate. An evaluation of the pilot commissioned by the Scottish Executive found that it appeared in many respects to be working well. It was a tightly run court that dealt with a heavy volume of business. With its fast track procedures and additional resources it was regarded as a model to be aspired to in all summary court business. Whether a dedicated Youth Court was required or whether procedural improvements would have been possible in the absence of dedicated resources and personnel was, however, more difficult to assess. Two issues in particular required further attention. First, consideration needed to be given to whether the Youth Court should be more explicitly youth focused and what this might entail. Second, greater clarity was required regarding for whom the Youth Court was intended to avoid the risk of net-widening and its consequences for young people.
Type: Research Report
Rights: © Crown Copyright 2006; Use in this Repository permitted as holders of the PSI Click Use Licence: Licence Holder: University of Stirling, Licence no. C2006002087
Affiliation: University of Stirling
University of Stirling
Applied Social Science
Applied Social Science
University of Stirling
Applied Social Science
University of Stirling
University of Stirling
University of Stirling
The Open University

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
airdrie yc.pdf722 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

This item is protected by original copyright

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.