Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/11914
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDuncan, Edwarden_UK
dc.contributor.authorMurray, Jenniferen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2018-04-26T00:23:23Z-
dc.date.available2018-04-26T00:23:23Z-
dc.date.issued2012-04-16en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/11914-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Allied Health Professionals today are required, more than ever before, to demonstrate their impact. However, despite at least 20 years of expectation, many services fail to deliver routine outcome measurement in practice. This systematic review investigates what helps and hinders routine outcome measurement of allied health professionals practice. Methods: A systematic review protocol was developed comprising: a defined search strategy for PsycINFO, MEDLINE and CINHAL databases and inclusion criteria and systematic procedures for data extraction and quality appraisal. Studies were included if they were published in English and investigated facilitators and/or barriers to routine outcome measurement by allied health professionals. No restrictions were placed on publication type, design, country, or year of publication. Reference lists of included publications were searched to identify additional papers. Descriptive methods were used to synthesise the findings. Results: 960 papers were retrieved; 15 met the inclusion criteria. Professional groups represented were Physiotherapy, Occupational Therapy, and Speech and Language Therapy. The included literature varied in quality and design. Facilitators and barriers to routine outcome measurement exist at individual, managerial and organisational levels. Key factors affecting professionals' use of routine outcome measurement include: professionals' level of knowledge and confidence about using outcome measures, and the degree of organisational and peer-support professionals received with a view to promoting their work in practice. Conclusions: Whilst the importance of routinely measuring outcomes within the allied health professions is well recognised, it has largely failed to be delivered in practice. Factors that influence clinicians' ability and desire to undertake routine outcome measurement are bi-directional: they can act as either facilitators or barriers. Routine outcome measurement may only be deliverable if appropriate action is taken at individual therapist, team, and organisational levels of an organisation.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherBioMed Central Ltden_UK
dc.relationDuncan E & Murray J (2012) The barriers and facilitators to routine outcome measurement by allied health professionals in practice: a systematic review. BMC Health Services Research, 12 (96). https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-12-96en_UK
dc.rights© 2012 Duncan and Murray; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/12/96en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/en_UK
dc.subjectAllied health professionalen_UK
dc.subjectRoutine outcome measurementen_UK
dc.subjectOutcome measurementen_UK
dc.subjectFacilitatorsen_UK
dc.subjectBarriersen_UK
dc.subjectOccupational therapyen_UK
dc.subjectPhysical therapyen_UK
dc.subjectPhysiotherapyen_UK
dc.subjectSpeech and language therapyen_UK
dc.subjectNurses Prescription privilegesen_UK
dc.subjectDrugs Prescribingen_UK
dc.titleThe barriers and facilitators to routine outcome measurement by allied health professionals in practice: a systematic reviewen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/1472-6963-12-96en_UK
dc.identifier.pmid22506982en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleBMC Health Services Researchen_UK
dc.citation.issn1472-6963en_UK
dc.citation.volume12en_UK
dc.citation.issue96en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.author.emailedward.duncan@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNMAHPen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNMAHPen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000304410000001en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-84861433720en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid888080en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-3400-905Xen_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2012-04-16en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2013-04-15en_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorDuncan, Edward|0000-0002-3400-905Xen_UK
local.rioxx.authorMurray, Jennifer|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2013-04-15en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/|2013-04-15|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameThe Barriers and Facilitators to Routine Outcome Measurement.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
The Barriers and Facilitators to Routine Outcome Measurement.pdfFulltext - Published Version344.81 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.