Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/11521
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBauld, Lindaen_UK
dc.contributor.authorBoyd, Kathleenen_UK
dc.contributor.authorBriggs, Andrewen_UK
dc.contributor.authorChesterman, Johnen_UK
dc.contributor.authorFerguson, Janeten_UK
dc.contributor.authorJudge, Kenen_UK
dc.contributor.authorHiscock, Rosemaryen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2018-04-17T23:21:37Z-
dc.date.available2018-04-17T23:21:37Zen_UK
dc.date.issued2011-02en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/11521-
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: An observational study examining 1-year follow-up of clients of two National Health Service smoking cessation services in Glasgow was used to inform a cost-effectiveness analysis. One service involved 7 weeks of group-based support (n = 411) and the other consisted of up to 12 weeks of one-to-one counseling with pharmacists (n = 1,374). Pharmacological aids to quitting (e.g., nicotine replacement therapy) were available to all clients. Methods: Quit rates were calculated for each service at 52 weeks after the quit date, and these were used for an economic evaluation of both the annual and the lifetime cost-effectiveness of the pharmacy- and group-based interventions in comparison with a baseline "self-quit" scenario. The annual cost-effectiveness model established the incremental cost per 52-week quitter, while a Markov model was developed for the lifetime analysis to estimate the potential lifetime outcomes in terms of cost per quality-adjusted life years (QALY) gained, to account for the benefits quitters will receive in terms of extended life years and improvements in quality of life from smoking cessation. Results: The proportion of carbon monoxide-validated quitters from both services combined fell from 22.5% at 4-week follow-up to 3.6% at 52 weeks. The group service achieved a higher quit rate (6.3%) than the pharmacy service (2.8%) but was more intensive and required greater overhead costs. The lifetime analysis resulted in an incremental cost per QALY of £4,800 for the group support and £2,600 for pharmacy one-to-one counseling. Conclusions: Despite disappointing 1-year quit rates, both services were considered to be highly cost-effective.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherOxford University Press for the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobaccoen_UK
dc.relationBauld L, Boyd K, Briggs A, Chesterman J, Ferguson J, Judge K & Hiscock R (2011) One-year outcomes and a cost-effectiveness analysis for smokers accessing group-based and pharmacy-led cessation services. Nicotine and Tobacco Research, 13 (2), pp. 135-145. https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntq222en_UK
dc.rightsThe publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserveden_UK
dc.titleOne-year outcomes and a cost-effectiveness analysis for smokers accessing group-based and pharmacy-led cessation servicesen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.rights.embargodate2999-12-29en_UK
dc.rights.embargoreason[Bauld_2011_One-Year_Outcomes.pdf] The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository therefore there is an embargo on the full text of the work.en_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/ntr/ntq222en_UK
dc.identifier.pmid21196451en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleNicotine and Tobacco Researchen_UK
dc.citation.issn1469-994Xen_UK
dc.citation.issn1462-2203en_UK
dc.citation.volume13en_UK
dc.citation.issue2en_UK
dc.citation.spage135en_UK
dc.citation.epage145en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.author.emaillinda.bauld@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationInstitute for Social Marketingen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Glasgowen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Glasgowen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Bathen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationSocio-Management - LEGACYen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Bathen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Bathen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000286670100011en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-79251581611en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid888263en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2011-02-28en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2013-03-25en_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorBauld, Linda|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorBoyd, Kathleen|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorBriggs, Andrew|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorChesterman, John|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorFerguson, Janet|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorJudge, Ken|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorHiscock, Rosemary|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2999-12-29en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved||en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameBauld_2011_One-Year_Outcomes.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source1462-2203en_UK
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Bauld_2011_One-Year_Outcomes.pdfFulltext - Published Version392.46 kBAdobe PDFUnder Embargo until 2999-12-29    Request a copy


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.