Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/11515
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorColeman, Timen_UK
dc.contributor.authorMcEwen, Andyen_UK
dc.contributor.authorBauld, Lindaen_UK
dc.contributor.authorFerguson, Janeten_UK
dc.contributor.authorLorgelly, Paulaen_UK
dc.contributor.authorLewis, Sarahen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2015-02-10T09:59:42Z-
dc.date.available2015-02-10T09:59:42Z-
dc.date.issued2009-04en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/11515-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Telephone quit lines are accessible to many smokers and are used to engage motivated smokers to make quit attempts. Smoking cessation counselling provided via telephone can either be reactive (i.e. primarily involving the provision of evidence-based information), or proactive (i.e. primarily involving repeated, sequenced calls from and interaction with trained cessation counsellors). Some studies have found proactive telephone counselling more effective and this trial will investigate whether or not proactive telephone support for smoking cessation, delivered through the National Health Service (NHS) Smoking Helpline is more effective or cost-effective than reactive support. It will also investigate whether or not providing nicotine replacement therapy (NRT), in addition to telephone counselling, has an adjunctive impact on smoking cessation rates and whether or not this is cost effective. Methods: This will be a parallel group, factorial design RCT, conducted through the English national NHS Smoking Helpline which is run from headquarters in Glasgow. Participants will be smokers who call the helpline from any location in England and who wish to stop smoking. If 644 participants are recruited to four equally-sized trial groups (total sample size = 2576), the trial will have 90% power for detecting a treatment effect (Odds Ratio) of 1.5 for each of the two interventions: i) proactive versus reactive support and ii) the offer of NRT versus no offer. The primary outcome measure for the study is self-reported, prolonged abstinence from smoking for at least six months following an agreed quit date. A concurrent health economic evaluation will investigate the cost effectiveness of the two interventions when delivered via a telephone helpline. Discussion: The PORTSSS trial will provide high quality evidence to determine the most appropriate kind of counselling which should be provided via the NHS Smoking Helpline and also whether or not an additional offer of cost-free NRT is effective and cost effective for smoking cessation. Trial Registration: (clinicaltrials.gov): NCT00775944en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherBioMed Centralen_UK
dc.relationColeman T, McEwen A, Bauld L, Ferguson J, Lorgelly P & Lewis S (2009) Protocol for the proactive or reactive telephone smoking cessation support (PORTSSS) trial. Trials, 10 (26). https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-10-26en_UK
dc.rights© 2009 Coleman et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/en_UK
dc.titleProtocol for the proactive or reactive telephone smoking cessation support (PORTSSS) trialen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/1745-6215-10-26en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleTrialsen_UK
dc.citation.issn1745-6215en_UK
dc.citation.volume10en_UK
dc.citation.issue26en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.author.emaillinda.bauld@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Nottinghamen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity College Londonen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationInstitute for Social Marketingen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationSocio-Management - LEGACYen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Glasgowen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Nottinghamen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000266532100001en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-65649148702en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid723775en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2009-04-30en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2013-03-25en_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorColeman, Tim|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorMcEwen, Andy|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorBauld, Linda|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorFerguson, Janet|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorLorgelly, Paula|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorLewis, Sarah|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2013-03-25en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/|2013-03-25|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameBauld_2009_Protocol_for_the_Proactive_Or_Reactive_Telephone_Smoking.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Bauld_2009_Protocol_for_the_Proactive_Or_Reactive_Telephone_Smoking.pdfFulltext - Published Version315.01 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.