Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/11461
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorJohnston, Colinen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-15T23:14:34Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-15T23:14:34Z-
dc.date.issued2014-03en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/11461-
dc.description.abstractFirst paragraph: This paper seeks to understand various paradoxes as cases of conflicting rules. In particular, the ambition is to outline a new perspective on and response to the Liar -- though it will take us a while to get that far. We begin in Section 1 with an account of simple rule confliction. Section 2 then brings this account to bear on a paradox, the Secretary Liberation Paradox, which is readily seen to involve conflicting rules. Finally in Section 3 I suggest that the Liar can also be seen as a case of rule confliction, and outline briefly how that perspective provides for Liar arguments to be blocked.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwellen_UK
dc.relationJohnston C (2014) Conflicting Rules and Paradox. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 88 (2), pp. 410-433. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1933-1592.2012.00588.xen_UK
dc.rightsThe publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserveden_UK
dc.titleConflicting Rules and Paradoxen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.rights.embargodate2999-12-02en_UK
dc.rights.embargoreason[Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 2014.pdf] The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository therefore there is an embargo on the full text of the work.en_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1933-1592.2012.00588.xen_UK
dc.citation.jtitlePhilosophy and Phenomenological Researchen_UK
dc.citation.issn1933-1592en_UK
dc.citation.issn0031-8205en_UK
dc.citation.volume88en_UK
dc.citation.issue2en_UK
dc.citation.spage410en_UK
dc.citation.epage433en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.author.emailcolin.johnston@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date01/06/2012en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationPhilosophyen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000333404400007en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-84861654064en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid727222en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0003-0185-0886en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2012-06-01en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2013-03-20en_UK
dc.subject.tagPhilosophy of Logicen_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorJohnston, Colin|0000-0003-0185-0886en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2999-12-02en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved||en_UK
local.rioxx.filenamePhilosophy and Phenomenological Research 2014.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source1933-1592en_UK
Appears in Collections:Law and Philosophy Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 2014.pdfFulltext - Published Version128.95 kBAdobe PDFUnder Embargo until 2999-12-02    Request a copy


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.