Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/11453
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCabrelli, Daviden_UK
dc.contributor.authorZahn, Rebeccaen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2013-03-20T16:55:16Z-
dc.date.available2013-03-20T16:55:16Zen_UK
dc.date.issued2012-09en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/11453-
dc.description.abstractFirst paragraph: Under general contractual principles, if one party commits a repudiatory breach of contract, the other party is entitled to either terminate or affirm the contract. However, there has been a long-standing debate as to whether the same elective principles apply in relation to the employment contract or whether the law ought to prefer a theory based on automatic termination which posits that one party's unilateral repudiatory breach operates automatically to bring the contract of employment to an end. Different approaches have been tried and tested in England and Scotland which have resulted in the common law being in an unsatisfactory state as it currently stands. The Supreme Court has the opportunity to bring clarity to this area of the law in the upcoming case of Geys v Société Générale, London Branch which was decided by the Court of Appeal on 30 March 2011. Leave to appeal to the Supreme Court was granted on 1 November 2011.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherOxford University Pressen_UK
dc.relationCabrelli D & Zahn R (2012) The Elective and Automatic Theories of Termination at Common Law: resolving the conundrum?. Industrial Law Journal, 41 (3), p. 346–357. https://doi.org/10.1093/indlaw/dws024en_UK
dc.rightsThe publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserveden_UK
dc.titleThe Elective and Automatic Theories of Termination at Common Law: resolving the conundrum?en_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.rights.embargodate2999-12-31en_UK
dc.rights.embargoreason[346.full.pdf] The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository therefore there is an embargo on the full text of the work.en_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/indlaw/dws024en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleIndustrial Law Journalen_UK
dc.citation.issn1464-3669en_UK
dc.citation.issn0305-9332en_UK
dc.citation.volume41en_UK
dc.citation.issue3en_UK
dc.citation.spage346en_UK
dc.citation.epage357en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.author.emailrebecca.zahn@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Edinburghen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationLawen_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-84866384201en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid729769en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2012-09-30en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2013-03-18en_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorCabrelli, David|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorZahn, Rebecca|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2999-12-31en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved||en_UK
local.rioxx.filename346.full.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source0305-9332en_UK
Appears in Collections:Law and Philosophy Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
346.full.pdfFulltext - Published Version82.48 kBAdobe PDFUnder Permanent Embargo    Request a copy


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.