Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Appears in Collections:Psychology Research Reports
Peer Review Status: Refereed
Title: Body odor similarity in noncohabiting twins
Author(s): Roberts, S Craig
Gosling, L Morris
Spector, Tim D
Miller, Paul D
Penn, Dustin J
Petrie, Marion
Contact Email:
Citation: Roberts SC, Gosling LM, Spector TD, Miller PD, Penn DJ & Petrie M (2005) Body odor similarity in noncohabiting twins. Chemical Senses, 30 (8), pp. 651-656.
Keywords: disassortative
Twins Psychology
Smell Psychological aspects
Chemical senses
Issue Date: Oct-2005
Date Deposited: 30-Jan-2013
Publisher: Oxford University Press
Abstract: There is currently considerable interest in biometric approaches using human odor as a marker of disease or genetic individuality. Body odor is also thought to be used during mate choice to select genetically compatible mates. The idea that body odor reveals information about both genetic identity and genetic similarity is most readily tested by examining odor in twin pairs. However, although this idea can be traced back 130 years to Francis Galton in 1875, most studies using dogs fail to control for shared environmental effects associated with cohabitation. Here we show that odors of identical twins (but not dizygotic twins) can be matched by human sniffers at rates better than chance, even when the twins are living apart. In addition, matching frequencies for identical twin odors were not significantly different from those for duplicate odors from the same individual. These results indicate an important genetic influence on body odor and the potential for developing technologies for human odor printing in relation to underlying genotype.
Type: Journal Article
DOI Link: 10.1093/chemse/bji058
Rights: The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.
Affiliation: Psychology
Newcastle University
St Thomas' Hospital, London
Newcastle University
Konrad Lorenz Institute for Ethology, Austria
Newcastle University
Licence URL(s):

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2005_Twin_ChemSenses.pdfFulltext - Published Version104.67 kBAdobe PDFUnder Embargo until 3000-01-01    Request a copy

Note: If any of the files in this item are currently embargoed, you can request a copy directly from the author by clicking the padlock icon above. However, this facility is dependent on the depositor still being contactable at their original email address.

This item is protected by original copyright

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.