Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/10668
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorEntwistle, Vikkien_UK
dc.contributor.authorFrance, Emmaen_UK
dc.contributor.authorWyke, Sallyen_UK
dc.contributor.authorJepson, Ruthen_UK
dc.contributor.authorHunt, Kateen_UK
dc.contributor.authorZiebland, Sue Ben_UK
dc.contributor.authorThompson, Andrewen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2018-04-04T01:54:02Z-
dc.date.available2018-04-04T01:54:02Zen_UK
dc.date.issued2011-12en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/10668-
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE To investigate people's views of using 'general facts' and information about other people's 'personal experiences' for health-related decision-making. METHODS Sixty-two people, who between them had experience of five different focal health issues, participated in 12 focus groups and 9 interviews. Exploration of uses of the two types of information was supported by discussion of illustrative excerpts. RESULTS There was less discussion of 'general facts'; participants thought it obvious that good decisions required these. Participants reported having used 'personal experiences' information to: recognise decisions that needed consideration; identify options; appraise options and make selections (including by developing and reflecting on their reasoning about possible choices); and support coping strategies. Their inclination to use 'personal experiences' information was apparently moderated by assessments of personal relevance, the motives of information providers and the 'balance' of experiences presented. CONCLUSION People can use 'personal experiences' information in various ways to support their decision-making, and exercise some discrimination as they do. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS 'Personal experiences' information may help people in a number of ways in relation to decision-making. However, 'personal experiences' information does not replace the need for 'general facts' and care should be taken when it is used in resources for patients.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherElsevieren_UK
dc.relationEntwistle V, France E, Wyke S, Jepson R, Hunt K, Ziebland SB & Thompson A (2011) How information about other people's personal experiences can help with healthcare decision-making: a qualitative study. Patient Education and Counseling, 85 (3), pp. e291-e298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2011.05.014en_UK
dc.rightsThe publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserveden_UK
dc.subjectExperiential informationen_UK
dc.subjectPatients’ narrativesen_UK
dc.subjectDecision-makingen_UK
dc.subjectScreening decisionsen_UK
dc.subjectTreatment decisionsen_UK
dc.titleHow information about other people's personal experiences can help with healthcare decision-making: a qualitative studyen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.rights.embargodate3000-01-01en_UK
dc.rights.embargoreason[Entwistle et al_PEC_2011.pdf] The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository therefore there is an embargo on the full text of the work.en_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.pec.2011.05.014en_UK
dc.identifier.pmid21652162en_UK
dc.citation.jtitlePatient Education and Counselingen_UK
dc.citation.issn0738-3991en_UK
dc.citation.volume85en_UK
dc.citation.issue3en_UK
dc.citation.spagee291en_UK
dc.citation.epagee298en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.author.emailruth.jepson@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Dundeeen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationHealth Sciences Research - Stirling - LEGACYen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNMAHPen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationHealth Sciences Stirlingen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationInstitute for Social Marketingen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Oxforden_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Edinburghen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000209543000018en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-81555203487en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid899583en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0003-0876-7030en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-9446-445Xen_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-5873-3632en_UK
dc.date.accepted2011-05-05en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2011-05-05en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2013-01-21en_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorEntwistle, Vikki|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorFrance, Emma|0000-0003-0876-7030en_UK
local.rioxx.authorWyke, Sally|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorJepson, Ruth|0000-0002-9446-445Xen_UK
local.rioxx.authorHunt, Kate|0000-0002-5873-3632en_UK
local.rioxx.authorZiebland, Sue B|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorThompson, Andrew|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate3000-01-01en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved||en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameEntwistle et al_PEC_2011.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source0738-3991en_UK
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Entwistle et al_PEC_2011.pdfFulltext - Published Version763.42 kBAdobe PDFUnder Embargo until 3000-01-01    Request a copy


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.