Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/10138
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHoddinott, Paten_UK
dc.contributor.authorCraig, Leone C Aen_UK
dc.contributor.authorMacLennan, Graemeen_UK
dc.contributor.authorBoyers, Dwayneen_UK
dc.contributor.authorVale, Lukeen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2014-09-13T14:39:21Z-
dc.date.available2014-09-13T14:39:21Z-
dc.date.issued2012-04en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/10138-
dc.description.abstractObjective: To assess the feasibility of implementing a dedicated feeding support team on a postnatal ward and pilot the potential effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of team (proactive) and woman-initiated (reactive) telephone support after discharge. Design: Randomised controlled trial embedded within a before-and-after study. Participatory approach and mixed-method process evaluation. Setting: A postnatal ward in Scotland. Sample: Women living in disadvantaged areas initiating breast feeding. Methods: Eligible women were recruited to a before-and-after intervention study, a proportion of whom were independently randomised after hospital discharge to intervention: daily proactive and reactive telephone calls for ≤14 days or control: reactive telephone calls ≤ day 14. Intention-to-treat analysis compared the randomised groups on cases with complete outcomes at follow-up. Main outcome measures: Primary outcome: any breast feeding at 6-8 weeks assessed by a telephone call from a researcher blind to group allocation. Secondary outcomes: exclusive breast feeding, satisfaction with care, NHS costs and cost per additional woman breast feeding. Results: There was no difference in feeding outcomes for women initiating breast feeding before the intervention (n=413) and after (n=388). 69 women were randomised to telephone support: 35 intervention (32 complete cases) and 34 control (26 complete cases). 22 intervention women compared with 12 control women were giving their baby some breast milk (RR 1.49, 95% CI 0.92 to 2.40) and 17 intervention women compared with eight control women were exclusively breast feeding (RR 1.73, 95% CI 0.88 to 3.37) at 6-8 weeks after birth. The incremental cost of providing proactive calls was £87 per additional woman breast feeding and £91 per additional woman exclusively breast feeding at 6-8 weeks; costs were sensitive to service organisation. Conclusions: Proactive telephone care delivered by a dedicated feeding team shows promise as a cost-effective intervention for improving breastfeeding outcomes. Integrating the FEeding Support Team (FEST) intervention into routine postnatal care was feasible.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherBioMed Central Ltden_UK
dc.relationHoddinott P, Craig LCA, MacLennan G, Boyers D & Vale L (2012) The FEeding Support Team (FEST) randomised, controlled feasibility trial of proactive and reactive telephone support for breastfeeding women living in disadvantaged areas. BMJ Open, 2 (2), p. e000652. http://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/2/2/e000652.full; https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000652en_UK
dc.rightsThis is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode. BMJ Open2012;2:e000652 doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000652en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/en_UK
dc.titleThe FEeding Support Team (FEST) randomised, controlled feasibility trial of proactive and reactive telephone support for breastfeeding women living in disadvantaged areasen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000652en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleBMJ Openen_UK
dc.citation.issn2044-6055en_UK
dc.citation.volume2en_UK
dc.citation.issue2en_UK
dc.citation.spagee000652en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.identifier.urlhttp://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/2/2/e000652.fullen_UK
dc.author.emailp.m.hoddinott@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.description.notesAdditional co-author: The FEST Project Teamen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationHealth Sciences Research - Stirling - LEGACYen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Aberdeenen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Aberdeenen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Aberdeenen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNewcastle Universityen_UK
dc.identifier.wtid744662en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-4372-9681en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2012-04-30en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2012-12-12en_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorHoddinott, Pat|0000-0002-4372-9681en_UK
local.rioxx.authorCraig, Leone C A|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorMacLennan, Graeme|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorBoyers, Dwayne|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorVale, Luke|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2012-12-12en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/|2012-12-12|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameFEST 1 BMJ Open 2012.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FEST 1 BMJ Open 2012.pdfFulltext - Published Version842.91 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.