Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/9060
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorO'Connor, Daryl Ben_UK
dc.contributor.authorO'Connor, Roryen_UK
dc.contributor.authorWhite, Barbara Len_UK
dc.contributor.authorBundred, Peter Een_UK
dc.date.accessioned2012-09-12T12:14:48Z-
dc.date.available2012-09-12T12:14:48Zen_UK
dc.date.issued2001-01en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/9060-
dc.description.abstractBackground. Occupational stress has been implicated as an independent risk factor in the aetiology of coronary heart disease and increased hypertensive risk in a number of occupations. Despite the large number of studies into GP stress, none have employed an objective physiological stress correlate. Objectives. We conducted an exploratory study to investigate whether self-reported occupational stress levels as measured by the General Practitioner Stress Index (GPSI) were predictive of ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) using a Spacelabs 90207 in a sample of British GPs. Method. Twenty-seven GPs (17 males, 10 females) participated in the study. Each GP wore an ABP monitor on a normal workday and non-workday. All GPs completed the GPSI before returning the ABP monitors. Demographic data were also collected. Results. Stress associated with ‘interpersonal and organizational change’ emerged from the stepwise multiple regression analysis as the only significant predictor of ABP, explaining 21% of the variance in workday systolic blood pressure, 26% during the workday evening and 19% during the non-workday. For diastolic blood pressure, the same variable explained 29% of the variability during the workday and 17% during the non-workday. No significant gender differences were found on any of the ABP measures. Conclusions. For the first time in GP stress research, our findings established that higher levels of self-reported occupational stress are predictive of greater ABP in British GPs. More detailed psychophysiological research and stress management interventions are required to isolate the effects of occupational stress in British GPs.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherOxford University Pressen_UK
dc.relationO'Connor DB, O'Connor R, White BL & Bundred PE (2001) Are occupational stress levels predictive of ambulatory blood pressure in British GPs? An exploratory study. Family Practice, 18 (1), pp. 92-94. https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/18.1.92en_UK
dc.rightsThe publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserveden_UK
dc.subjectAmbulatory blood pressureen_UK
dc.subjectGPsen_UK
dc.subjectoccupational stressen_UK
dc.subjectorganizational changeen_UK
dc.titleAre occupational stress levels predictive of ambulatory blood pressure in British GPs? An exploratory studyen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.rights.embargodate3000-01-01en_UK
dc.rights.embargoreason[O'Connoretal_FP_2001.pdf] The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository therefore there is an embargo on the full text of the work.en_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/fampra/18.1.92en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleFamily Practiceen_UK
dc.citation.issn1460-2229en_UK
dc.citation.issn0263-2136en_UK
dc.citation.volume18en_UK
dc.citation.issue1en_UK
dc.citation.spage92en_UK
dc.citation.epage94en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.author.emailrory.oconnor@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Leedsen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationPsychologyen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Liverpoolen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Liverpoolen_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-0035139710en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid766187en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2001-01-31en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2012-09-12en_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorO'Connor, Daryl B|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorO'Connor, Rory|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorWhite, Barbara L|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorBundred, Peter E|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate3000-01-01en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved||en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameO'Connoretal_FP_2001.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source0263-2136en_UK
Appears in Collections:Psychology Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
O'Connoretal_FP_2001.pdfFulltext - Published Version116.02 kBAdobe PDFUnder Embargo until 3000-01-01    Request a copy


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.