Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/882
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorOsborne, Juliet Len_UK
dc.contributor.authorMartin, Andrew Pen_UK
dc.contributor.authorCarreck, Norman Len_UK
dc.contributor.authorSwain, Jennifer Len_UK
dc.contributor.authorKnight, Mairi Een_UK
dc.contributor.authorGoulson, Daveen_UK
dc.contributor.authorHale, Roddy Jen_UK
dc.contributor.authorSanderson, Roy Aen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2013-06-09T03:38:04Z-
dc.date.available2013-06-09T03:38:04Z-
dc.date.issued2008-03en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/882-
dc.description.abstract1. Foraging range is a key aspect of the ecology of “central place foragers”. Estimating how far bees fly under different circumstances is essential for predicting colony success, and for estimating bee-mediated gene flow between plant populations. It is likely to be strongly influenced by forage distribution, something that is hard to quantify in all but the simplest landscapes; and theories of foraging distance tend to assume a homogeneous forage distribution. 2. We quantified the distribution of bumblebee (Bombus terrestris L.) foragers away from experimentally positioned colonies, in an agricultural landscape, using two (mutually reinforcing) methods. We mass-marked foragers as they left the colony, and analysed pollen from foragers returning to the colonies. The data were set within the context of the “forage landscape”: a map of the spatial distribution of forage as determined from remote-sensed data. To our knowledge, this is the first time that empirical data on foraging distances and forage availability, at this resolution and scale, has been collected and combined for bumblebees. 3. The bees foraged at least 1.5 km from their colonies, and the proportion of foragers flying to one field declined, approximately linearly, with radial distance. In this landscape there was great variation in forage availability within 500 m of colonies but little variation beyond 1 km, regardless of colony location. 4. The scale of B.terrestris foraging was large enough to buffer against effects of forage patch and flowering crop heterogeneity, but bee species with shorter foraging range may experience highly variable colony success according to location.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherBritish Ecological Society / Blackwell Publishingen_UK
dc.relationOsborne JL, Martin AP, Carreck NL, Swain JL, Knight ME, Goulson D, Hale RJ & Sanderson RA (2008) Bumblebee flight distances in relation to the forage landscape. Journal of Animal Ecology, 77 (2), pp. 406-415. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2007.01333.xen_UK
dc.rightsPublished in Journal of Animal Ecology. Copyright: Blackwell Publishing. The definitive version is available at www.blackwell-synergy.com. Author Posting. © Juliet L. Osborne, Andrew P. Martin, Norman L. Carreck, Jennifer L. Swain, Mairi E. Knight, Dave Goulson, Roddy J. Hale and Roy A. Sanderson, 2008. The full text of this article is published in Journal of Animal Ecology, Volume 77, Issue 2, Pages 406-415. It is available online from Blackwell-Synergy at http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2007.01333.xen_UK
dc.subjectborage, foraging range, pollen analysis, mass marking experimenten_UK
dc.subjectBumblebees Behavioren_UK
dc.subjectBees Behavioren_UK
dc.subjectInsects Fooden_UK
dc.subjectPalynologyen_UK
dc.titleBumblebee flight distances in relation to the forage landscapeen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1365-2656.2007.01333.xen_UK
dc.citation.jtitleJournal of Animal Ecologyen_UK
dc.citation.issn1365-2656en_UK
dc.citation.issn0021-8790en_UK
dc.citation.volume77en_UK
dc.citation.issue2en_UK
dc.citation.spage406en_UK
dc.citation.epage415en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusAM - Accepted Manuscripten_UK
dc.author.emaildave.goulson@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date07/11/2007en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationRothamsted Researchen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationRothamsted Researchen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationRothamsted Researchen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationRothamsted Researchen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Plymouthen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationBiological and Environmental Sciencesen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationLincoln Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNewcastle Universityen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000252810400025en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-38849130158en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid834918en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2007-11-07en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2009-03-04en_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionAMen_UK
local.rioxx.authorOsborne, Juliet L|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorMartin, Andrew P|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorCarreck, Norman L|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorSwain, Jennifer L|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorKnight, Mairi E|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorGoulson, Dave|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorHale, Roddy J|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorSanderson, Roy A|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2009-03-04en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved|2009-03-04|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameOsborne et al bee foraging JAnimEcol revised 160807.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source0021-8790en_UK
Appears in Collections:Biological and Environmental Sciences Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Osborne et al bee foraging JAnimEcol revised 160807.pdfFulltext - Accepted Version561.46 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.