Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Appears in Collections:Law and Philosophy Journal Articles
Peer Review Status: Refereed
Title: Rohbraugh and deRosset on the Necessity of Origin
Authors: Cameron, Ross
Roca-Royes, Sonia
Contact Email:
Keywords: Necessity of Origin
Issue Date: Apr-2006
Publisher: Oxford University Press
Citation: Cameron R & Roca-Royes S (2006) Rohbraugh and deRosset on the Necessity of Origin, Mind, 115 (458), pp. 361-366.
Abstract: In ‘A New Route to the Necessity of Origin’, Rohbraugh and deRosset offer an argu-ment for the Necessity of Origin appealing neither to Sufficiency of Origin nor to abranching-times model of necessity. What is doing the crucial work in their argu-ment is instead the thesis they name ‘Locality of Prevention’. In this response, we ob-ject that their argument is question-begging by showing, first, that the locality ofprevention thesis is not strong enough to satisfactorily derive from it the intendedconclusion, and, second, that the argument is not sound unless the Necessity of Origin is operating as an implicit premiss.
Type: Journal Article
DOI Link:
Rights: Published in Mind by Oxford University Press. This is a pre-copy-editing, author-produced PDF of an article accepted for publication in Mind following peer review. The definitive publisher-authenticated version, Mind 2006 115(458):361-366, is available online at:
Affiliation: University of St Andrews

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Cameron&Roca_NecessityOrigin.pdf218.4 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

This item is protected by original copyright

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.