Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Appears in Collections:||Law and Philosophy Journal Articles|
|Peer Review Status: ||Refereed|
|Title: ||The Intrusion of Mercy|
|Authors: ||Duff, R A|
|Contact Email: ||firstname.lastname@example.org|
|Issue Date: ||2007|
|Citation: ||Duff RA (2007) The Intrusion of Mercy, Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, 4 (2), pp. 361-387.|
|Abstract: ||On the basis of a communicative theory of criminal punishment, I show how mercy has a significant but limited role to play in the criminal law—in particular (although not only) in criminal sentencing. Mercy involves an intrusion into the realm of criminal law of values and concerns that are not themselves part of the perspective of criminal law: a merciful sentencer acts beyond the limits of her legal role, on the basis of moral considerations that conflict with the demands of penal justice. Sometimes, however (but in a decent system of law in a decent society, rarely), that is how citizens should act. Finally, I discuss, and criticise, two attempts to find a place for mercy within a communicative conception of punishment, and argue that repentance is not an appropriate ground for leniency or mercy in sentencing.|
|Rights: ||The publisher has granted permission for use of this article in this repository. The article was first published in Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law by The Ohio State University Michael E. Moritz College of Law|
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact email@example.com providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.