|Appears in Collections:||Economics Journal Articles|
|Peer Review Status:||Refereed|
|Title:||The environmental spending needs of Scotland’s local authorities|
|Publisher:||Taylor & Francis (Routledge)|
|Citation:||King D, Pashley M & Ball R (2007) The environmental spending needs of Scotland’s local authorities, Local Government Studies, 33 (2), pp. 271-309.|
|Abstract:||Scottish citizens benefit from 19% more public spending per head than English citizens. The ‘Barnett formula’ is slowly reducing the gap, but very little is known about the countries’ relative needs and hence about how far the present gap is defensible: the aim of this paper is to throw some light on the countries’ relative needs. We begin with the complex formulae that the Westminster government uses to assess the spending needs of English local authorities, and we use these English formulae to assess the needs of Scottish local authorities for three major blocks of local services. These formulae suggest that Scotland needs 6.4% more per head than England for environmental, protective and cultural services, 8.1% more for highway maintenance, and between 24.3% and 35.3% more for fire services. We also combine these results with those of two other papers concerned with local education and social services to show that these English formulae put Scotland’s per capita needs for local government services as a whole at about 6% above England’s. However, we then compare the relative needs of Scottish local authorities as assessed by the English formulae with their relative needs as assessed by the Scottish needs formulae that are currently used by Holyrood, and we find major differences. This suggests either that at least one country uses seriously flawed formulae to assess needs, or that the two countries have different conceptions of need.|
|Rights:||Published by Taylor & Francis (Routledge)|
University of Stirling
Management Work and Organisation
|EPC Highway Fire Text Dec 05.pdf||507.09 kB||Adobe PDF||View/Open|
This item is protected by original copyright
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact email@example.com providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.