Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/7632
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBreen, Leighen_UK
dc.contributor.authorPhilp, Andrewen_UK
dc.contributor.authorShaw, Christopher Sen_UK
dc.contributor.authorJeukendrup, Asker Een_UK
dc.contributor.authorBaar, Keithen_UK
dc.contributor.authorTipton, Kevinen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2016-08-26T01:20:34Z-
dc.date.available2016-08-26T01:20:34Z-
dc.date.issued2011-06-20en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/7632-
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To investigate the mechanisms underpinning modifications in glucose homeostasis and insulin sensitivity 24 h after a bout of resistance exercise (RE) with or without protein ingestion. Methods: Twenty-four healthy males were assigned to a control (CON; n = 8), exercise (EX; n = 8) or exercise plus protein condition (EX+PRO; n = 8). Muscle biopsy and blood samples were obtained at rest for all groups and immediately post-RE (75% 1RM, 8×10 repetitions of leg-press and extension exercise) for EX and EX+PRO only. At 24 h post-RE (or post-resting biopsy for CON), a further muscle biopsy was obtained. Participants then consumed an oral glucose load (OGTT) containing 2 g of [U-13C] glucose during an infusion of 6, 6-[2H2] glucose. Blood samples were obtained every 10 min for 2 h to determine glucose kinetics. EX+PRO ingested an additional 25 g of intact whey protein with the OGTT. A final biopsy sample was obtained at the end of the OGTT. Results: Fasted plasma glucose and insulin were similar for all groups and were not different immediately post- and 24 h post-RE. Following RE, muscle glycogen was 26±8 and 19±6% lower in EX and EX+PRO, respectively. During OGTT, plasma glucose AUC was lower for EX and EX+PRO (75.1±2.7 and 75.3±2.8 mmol·L-1:120 min, respectively) compared with CON (90.6±4.1 mmol·L-1:120 min). Plasma insulin response was 13±2 and 21±4% lower for EX and CON, respectively, compared with EX+PRO. Glucose disappearance from the circulation was ~12% greater in EX and EX+PRO compared with CON. Basal 24 h post-RE and insulin-stimulated PAS-AS160/TBC1D4 phosphorylation was greater for EX and EX+PRO. Conclusions: Prior RE improves glycemic control and insulin sensitivity through an increase in the rate at which glucose is disposed from the circulation. However, co-ingesting protein during a high-glucose load does not augment this response at 24 h post-exercise in healthy, insulin-sensitive individuals.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherPublic Library of Scienceen_UK
dc.relationBreen L, Philp A, Shaw CS, Jeukendrup AE, Baar K & Tipton K (2011) Beneficial Effects of Resistance Exercise on Glycemic Control Are Not Further Improved by Protein Ingestion. PLoS ONE, 6 (6), p. e20613. http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0020613; https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0020613en_UK
dc.rightsPublisher is open-access. Open access publishing allows free access to and distribution of published articles where the author retains copyright of their work by employing a Creative Commons attribution licence. Proper attribution of authorship and correct citation details should be given. Publisher’s policy available from http://www.plos.org/about/open-access/license/.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_UK
dc.titleBeneficial Effects of Resistance Exercise on Glycemic Control Are Not Further Improved by Protein Ingestionen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0020613en_UK
dc.citation.jtitlePLoS ONEen_UK
dc.citation.issn1932-6203en_UK
dc.citation.volume6en_UK
dc.citation.issue6en_UK
dc.citation.spagee20613en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.identifier.urlhttp://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0020613en_UK
dc.author.emailk.d.tipton@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Birminghamen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Californiaen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Birminghamen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Birminghamen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of California, Davisen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationSporten_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000291983800007en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-79959316895en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid778975en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-6545-8122en_UK
dc.date.accepted2011-05-05en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2011-05-05en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2012-08-24en_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorBreen, Leigh|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorPhilp, Andrew|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorShaw, Christopher S|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorJeukendrup, Asker E|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorBaar, Keith|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorTipton, Kevin|0000-0002-6545-8122en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2012-08-24en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/|2012-08-24|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenamejournal.pone.0020613.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
journal.pone.0020613.pdfFulltext - Published Version777.16 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.