|Appears in Collections:||Economics Journal Articles|
|Peer Review Status:||Refereed|
|Title:||Examining the global environmental impact of regional consumption activities - Part 1: A technical note on combining input-output and ecological footprint analysis|
Multi-region input-output models
Embodied environmental impacts
|Citation:||Turner K, Lenzen M, Wiedmann T & Barrett J (2007) Examining the global environmental impact of regional consumption activities - Part 1: A technical note on combining input-output and ecological footprint analysis, Ecological Economics, 62 (1), pp. 37-44.|
|Abstract:||In recent years there have been a number of attempts to develop a more comprehensive approach to the issue of measuring resource use and/or pollution generation embodied in trade flows, including contributions that combine input- output techniques and Ecological Footprint analysis. In this two-part paper we describe how to enumerate the resource and/or pollution content of inter- regional and inter-national trade flows (Part 1) and we present a literature review of recent methodological and empirical developments (Part 2). It is straightforward in principle to extend the basic input-output approach to capture international trade flows. However, in practice, problems of data availability and compatibility, and of computability of extended input-output matrices, mean that simplifying assumptions are generally applied, but with the implications of these assumptions often not made fully explicit. What appears to be absent from previous applications is an account of the analytical method by which Ecological Footprints should ideally be estimated in an international input-output accounting analysis. This allows an explicit analysis of the problems that prevent the application of the full method and identification of the most appropriate short-cut methods in a transparent way. The objective of this paper is to provide such an account.|
|Rights:||Publisher policy allows this work to be made available in this repository. Ecological Economics, Volume 62, Issue 1, 1 April 2007, Pages 37–44, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.12.002|
University of Sydney
University of York
University of York
|Turner et al Ecological Economics 2007_Turner final version.pdf||445.72 kB||Adobe PDF||View/Open|
This item is protected by original copyright
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact email@example.com providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.