|Appears in Collections:||Law and Philosophy Journal Articles|
|Peer Review Status:||Refereed|
|Title:||Democracy, Political Equality, and Majority Rule|
|Publisher:||The University of Chicago Press|
|Citation:||Saunders B (2010) Democracy, Political Equality, and Majority Rule, Ethics, 121 (1), pp. 148-177.|
|Abstract:||Democracy is commonly associated with political equality and/or majority rule. This essay shows that these three ideas are conceptually separate, so the transition from any one to another stands in need of further substantive argument, which is not always adequately given. It does this by offering an alternative decision-making mechanism, called lottery voting, in which all individuals cast votes for their preferred options but, instead of these being counted, one is randomly selected and that vote determines the outcome. This procedure is democratic and egalitarian, since all have an equal chance to influence outcomes, but obviously not majoritarian.|
|Rights:||Publisher allows this work to be made available in this repository. Published in Ethics by The University of Chicago Press. The original publication is available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/656474|
This item is protected by original copyright
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact email@example.com providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.