http://hdl.handle.net/1893/7458
Appears in Collections: | Aquaculture Journal Articles |
Peer Review Status: | Refereed |
Title: | Fisheries production in Southeast Asian farmer managed aquatic systems (FMAS): I. Characterisation of systems |
Author(s): | Amilhat, Elsa Lorenzen, Kai Morales, Ernesto J Yakupitiyage, Amararatne Little, David C |
Contact Email: | d.c.little@stir.ac.uk |
Keywords: | Accounting Animals AQUACULTURE AREAS C concept Countries difference diversity FARMERS farming FIELD FIELDS fisheries fishery habitat HOUSEHOLDS Management market MARKETS ORDER PONDS resources rice-field rights SYSTEM Systems Technology Thailand Vietnam |
Issue Date: | Nov-2009 |
Date Deposited: | 10-Aug-2012 |
Citation: | Amilhat E, Lorenzen K, Morales EJ, Yakupitiyage A & Little DC (2009) Fisheries production in Southeast Asian farmer managed aquatic systems (FMAS): I. Characterisation of systems. Aquaculture, 296 (3-4), pp. 219-226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2009.08.014 |
Abstract: | Southeast Asian rice farmers often manage aquatic habitats and resources on their land to increase production of aquatic animals. We introduce the concept of 'farmer-managed aquatic systems' (FMAS) to capture the diversity of these resource systems at the interface of aquaculture and capture fisheries and characterize FMAS in contrasting agro-ecosystems of Cambodia, Thailand and Vietnam. Cambodian and Thai FMAS yielded primarily self-recruiting species (SRS) and were managed to allow or attract them, while Vietnamese FMAS were managed more intensively to produce mostly hatchery-reared species. More than 90% of rice fanning households in the study areas of Cambodia and Thailand harvested aquatic animals from their land, and about 70% created aquatic habitats such as ponds in addition to rice fields in order to increase aquatic resource production. Cambodian households created and utilized a wide variety of man-made aquatic habitats, while Thai households created predominantly trap ponds. In contrast, less than half of Vietnamese farming households harvested SRS and very few undertook FMAS management specifically for them. Vietnamese FMAS were intensively stocked and managed as aquaculture systems. with SRS accounting for less than 30% of production. Nonetheless, SRS production per area of FMAS was comparable in the three countries. Contrasting FMAS characteristics in different study areas reflect underlying differences in agro-ecosystems, aquaculture technologies, farmer livelihoods and markets. |
DOI Link: | 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2009.08.014 |
Rights: | The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study. |
Licence URL(s): | http://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved |
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
dlittle_aquaculture_2009.pdf | Fulltext - Published Version | 993.22 kB | Adobe PDF | Under Permanent Embargo Request a copy |
Note: If any of the files in this item are currently embargoed, you can request a copy directly from the author by clicking the padlock icon above. However, this facility is dependent on the depositor still being contactable at their original email address.
This item is protected by original copyright |
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.