Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/7341
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDonaldson, Daviden_UK
dc.contributor.authorPetersen, Steve Een_UK
dc.contributor.authorOllinger, John Men_UK
dc.contributor.authorBuckner, Randyen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2012-08-08T15:19:02Z-
dc.date.available2012-08-08T15:19:02Zen_UK
dc.date.issued2001-01en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/7341-
dc.description.abstractCognitive functions such as memory retrieval involve a combination of state- and item-related processes. State-related processes are sustained throughout a task (e.g., "retrieval mode" associated with ongoing goals), whereas item-related processes are transient and allied to individual stimuli (e.g., "retrieval success" associated with the recovery of information from memory). The present study employed a mixed "blocked and event-related" experimental design to identify neural mechanisms that support state- and item-related processes during a recognition memory task. Subjects alternated between blocks of fixation and recognition memory (discriminating between old and new words). Critically, event-related procedures were embedded within the recognition blocks, including the jittering of sequential trials. This design ensures that the temporal profiles of state- and item-related activity differ and consequently renders them separable; without this procedure item-related activity would summate to produce a state-like response. Results suggest three classes of brain region support recognition memory, exhibiting: (1) predominantly transient activity (including regions in medial parietal, lateral parietal, and anterior left frontal cortex) reflecting item-related processing associated with "retrieval success," (2) predominantly sustained activity (including decreased activity in bilateral parahippocampal cortex) reflecting state-related processing associated with "retrieval mode," (3) concurrent sustained and transient activity (including regions in left middle frontal gyrus, bilateral frontal operculum, and medial frontal gyrus), reflecting a combination of state- and item-related processing. The present findings support the idea that recognition memory tasks are dependent upon a combination of state- and item-related processes that have dissociable neural correlates identifiable using fMRI. Moreover, the mixed "blocked and event-related" design employed here provides a general procedure for separating state- and item-related processes.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherElsevieren_UK
dc.relationDonaldson D, Petersen SE, Ollinger JM & Buckner R (2001) Dissociating state and item components of recognition memory using fMRI. NeuroImage, 13 (1), pp. 129-142. https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.2000.0664en_UK
dc.rightsThe publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserveden_UK
dc.titleDissociating state and item components of recognition memory using fMRIen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.rights.embargodate3000-01-01en_UK
dc.rights.embargoreason[donaldson_NeuroImage_2001.pdf] The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository therefore there is an embargo on the full text of the work.en_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1006/nimg.2000.0664en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleNeuroImageen_UK
dc.citation.issn1053-8119en_UK
dc.citation.volume13en_UK
dc.citation.issue1en_UK
dc.citation.spage129en_UK
dc.citation.epage142en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.author.emaild.i.donaldson@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationPsychologyen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationWashington University In Saint Louisen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationWashington University In Saint Louisen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationWashington University In Saint Louisen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000166376000013en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid789765en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-8036-3455en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2001-01-31en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2012-08-08en_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorDonaldson, David|0000-0002-8036-3455en_UK
local.rioxx.authorPetersen, Steve E|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorOllinger, John M|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorBuckner, Randy|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate3000-01-01en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved||en_UK
local.rioxx.filenamedonaldson_NeuroImage_2001.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source1053-8119en_UK
Appears in Collections:Psychology Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
donaldson_NeuroImage_2001.pdfFulltext - Published Version1.56 MBAdobe PDFUnder Embargo until 3000-01-01    Request a copy


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.