Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/7264
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKnight, Mairi Een_UK
dc.contributor.authorMartin, Andrew Pen_UK
dc.contributor.authorBishop, Stephenen_UK
dc.contributor.authorOsborne, Juliet Len_UK
dc.contributor.authorHale, Roddy Jen_UK
dc.contributor.authorSanderson, Roy Aen_UK
dc.contributor.authorGoulson, Daveen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2012-08-08T13:10:44Z-
dc.date.available2012-08-08T13:10:44Zen_UK
dc.date.issued2005-05en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/7264-
dc.description.abstractBumblebees are major pollinators of crops and wildflowers in northern temperate regions. Knowledge of their ecology is vital for the design of effective management and conservation strategies but key aspects remain poorly understood. Here we employed microsatellite markers to estimate and compare foraging range and nest density among four UK species: Bombus terrestris, Bombus pascuorum, Bombus lapidarius, and Bombus pratorum. Workers were sampled along a 1.5-km linear transect across arable farmland. Eight or nine polymorphic microsatellite markers were then used to identify putative sisters. In accordance with previous studies, minimum estimated maximum foraging range was greatest for B. terrestris (758 m) and least for B. pascuorum (449 m). The estimate for B. lapidarius was similar to B. pascuorum (450 m), while that of B. pratorum was intermediate (674 m). Since the area of forage available to bees increases as the square of foraging range, these differences correspond to a threefold variation in the area used by bumblebee nests of different species. Possible explanations for these differences are discussed. Estimates for nest density at the times of sampling were 29, 68, 117, and 26/km2 for B. terrestris, B. pascuorum, B. lapidarius and B. pratorum, respectively. These data suggest that even among the most common British bumblebee species, significant differences in fundamental aspects of their ecology exist, a finding that should be reflected in management and conservation strategies.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherWileyen_UK
dc.relationKnight ME, Martin AP, Bishop S, Osborne JL, Hale RJ, Sanderson RA & Goulson D (2005) An interspecific comparison of foraging range and nest density of four bumblebee (Bombus) species. Molecular Ecology, 14 (6), pp. 1811-1820. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02540.xen_UK
dc.rightsThe publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserveden_UK
dc.subjectBombusen_UK
dc.subjectforaging rangeen_UK
dc.subjectkinshipen_UK
dc.subjectmicrosatellitesen_UK
dc.subjectnest densityen_UK
dc.titleAn interspecific comparison of foraging range and nest density of four bumblebee (Bombus) speciesen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.rights.embargodate3000-01-01en_UK
dc.rights.embargoreason[knight_interspecificcomparison_2005.pdf] The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository therefore there is an embargo on the full text of the work.en_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02540.xen_UK
dc.citation.jtitleMolecular Ecologyen_UK
dc.citation.issn1365-294Xen_UK
dc.citation.issn0962-1083en_UK
dc.citation.volume14en_UK
dc.citation.issue6en_UK
dc.citation.spage1811en_UK
dc.citation.epage1820en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.author.emaildave.goulson@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Southamptonen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationRothamsted Researchen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Southamptonen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationRothamsted Researchen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNewcastle Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNewcastle Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationBiological and Environmental Sciencesen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000228395900017en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid786602en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2005-05-31en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2012-08-03en_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorKnight, Mairi E|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorMartin, Andrew P|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorBishop, Stephen|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorOsborne, Juliet L|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorHale, Roddy J|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorSanderson, Roy A|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorGoulson, Dave|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate3000-01-01en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved||en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameknight_interspecificcomparison_2005.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source0962-1083en_UK
Appears in Collections:Biological and Environmental Sciences Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
knight_interspecificcomparison_2005.pdfFulltext - Published Version360.19 kBAdobe PDFUnder Embargo until 3000-01-01    Request a copy


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.