|Appears in Collections:||Management, Work and Organisation Journal Articles|
|Peer Review Status:||Refereed|
|Title:||Management Theory and Practice: bridging the gap through multidisciplinary lenses|
|Citation:||Brownlie D, Hewer P, Wagner B & Svensson G (2008) Management Theory and Practice: bridging the gap through multidisciplinary lenses, European Business Review, 20 (6), pp. 461-470.|
|Abstract:||Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to introduce the special issue that critically examines topics informing long-standing disputes concering the status of theory and practice in management studies. Contributions explore the character of the imputed relationship between theory and practice. Design/methodology/approach – The editorial introduction sets the discussion of topics in the context of institutional change influencing the production, circulation and consumption of knowledge products in the economy of relevance and reputation. It also presents an overview of the papers included in the special issue. Findings – The main themes addressed in the papers represent a call for change; a call to radicalize the approaches to understanding ways of knowing; a call to re-evaluate relations with practitioners; and a call to reimagine ways of representing knowledge to various constituencies, including fellow academic practitioners, management practitioners, students, and policy-makers and other opinion-formers. Research limitations/implications – The key message is one of the importance of encouraging broad discussions concerning the direction and impact of flows of knowledge and the various products in which that knowledge is embedded. It calls for a more market-oriented approach to understanding the knowledge economy and the mediating role of various institutional players, including the academy, in the circulation, creation and destruction of knowledge products. Practical implications – That a more-market oriented approach to arrangements for the distribution of research resources in management studies calls for the development of more market-oriented institutions capable of shaping relationships of collaboration, involvement and accountability. Originality/value – Contributions expand the understanding of the problems and opportunities of imputing links to theory and practice.|
|Rights:||Published in European Business Review by Emerald|
|Affiliation:||Marketing and Retail Division|
University of Strathclyde
University of Strathclyde
Oslo School of Management
|Theory-Practice-Bridging-Gap-EBR.pdf||64.5 kB||Adobe PDF||View/Open|
This item is protected by original copyright
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact firstname.lastname@example.org providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.