|Appears in Collections:||Law and Philosophy Journal Articles|
|Peer Review Status:||Refereed|
|Title:||Human rights pitted against man (II) - A response|
|Publisher:||Taylor & Francis (Routledge)|
|Citation:||Goodall K (2010) Human rights pitted against man (II) - A response, The International Journal of Human Rights, 14 (7), pp. 1165-1184.|
|Abstract:||The article responds to another article in this issue of the journal, ‘Human Rights Pitted Against Man (II) - the Network is Back', by Jakob Cornides. It considers the arguments he puts forward regarding inaccuracy and lack of objectivity in an opinion and a report produced by two influential fundamental rights agencies of the European Union. It finds that the arguments are, for the most part, misconceived, but welcomes the opportunity for a debate on the larger issues raised by Cornides' contributio|
|Rights:||This item has been embargoed for a period. During the embargo please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author, you can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.; Published in The International Journal of Human Rights by Taylor & Francis. This is an electronic version of an article published in The International Journal of Human Rights, (2010), 14 (7), 1139-1164. International Journal of Human Rights is available online at: http://www.informaworld.com/openurl?genre=article&issn=1364-2987&volume=143&issue=2&spage=1139|
|Cornides Response 2010 STORRE upload May 2012.pdf||413.9 kB||Adobe PDF||View/Open|
This item is protected by original copyright
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact email@example.com providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.