Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1893/38005| Appears in Collections: | Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles |
| Peer Review Status: | Refereed |
| Title: | Developing CAMELOT for assessing methodological limitations of qualitative research for inclusion in qualitative evidence syntheses |
| Author(s): | Munthe‐Kaas, Heather M Booth, Andrew Sommer, Isolde Cooper, Sara Garside, Ruth Hannes, Karin Noyes, Jane The CAMELOT Development Group, |
| Contact Email: | sam.dixon@stir.ac.uk |
| Keywords: | consensus development critical appraisal Delphi GRADE-CERQual metodological limitations qualitative evidence synthesis qualitative research |
| Issue Date: | Jun-2024 |
| Date Deposited: | 30-Apr-2026 |
| Citation: | Munthe‐Kaas HM, Booth A, Sommer I, Cooper S, Garside R, Hannes K, Noyes J & The CAMELOT Development Group (2024) Developing CAMELOT for assessing methodological limitations of qualitative research for inclusion in qualitative evidence syntheses. France E (Research Group) <i>Cochrane Evidence Synthesis and Methods</i>, 2 (6), Art. No.: e12058. https://doi.org/10.1002/cesm.12058 |
| Abstract: | Introduction Qualitative evidence is increasingly incorporated into decision-making processes. Assessing the methodological limitations of primary studies is critical to making an overall assessment of confidence in findings from qualitative evidence syntheses (QES) using GRADE-CERQual. Current critical appraisal tools were not developed specifically for use in Cochrane reviews or GRADE-CERQual, and few are evidence-based. The aim of CochrAne qualitative Methodological LimitatiOns Tool (CAMELOT) was to address this gap. Methods We undertook this project in four stages: (1) systematic literature search to identify existing tools, (2) identification of evidence to support inclusion of potential CAMELOT domains (3) consensus survey to agree on the inclusion and definition of CAMELOT domains, and (4) human-centered design approach to develop and refine CAMELOT by exploring user experience. Results CAMELOT is a new evidence-based tool for assessing the methodological strengths and limitations of primary qualitative research studies in a QES. CAMELOT is comprised of 12 domains: four Meta domains that encourage review authors to consider those characteristics of the primary study that are beyond how the study was carried out, but which inform the conduct and design of the study, and eight Method domains which encourage review authors to consider how the study was designed, planned and/or conducted, and how study conduct and design fits with the information provided in the four meta domains. Review authors make an assessment by identifying any concerns regarding the methods used in the study and considering the appropriateness of fit between the Meta and Method domains. Conclusion CAMELOT provides review authors with a transparent and systematic method to assess methodological limitations of primary qualitative studies. CAMELOT incorporates qualitative principles and focuses on appropriateness of fit between Meta and Method domains. In line with iterative tool development approach, CAMELOT will continue to be revised over time following extensive user testing and piloting. |
| DOI Link: | 10.1002/cesm.12058 |
| Rights: | This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
| Licence URL(s): | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cochrane Evidence Synthesis and Methods - 2024 - Munthe___Kaas - Developing CAMELOT for assessing methodological limitations.pdf | Fulltext - Published Version | 1.47 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
This item is protected by original copyright |
A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.
