Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/37997
Appears in Collections:History and Politics Journal Articles
Peer Review Status: Refereed
Title: “Discreet dominance”: peacekeeping deployments and international security force assistance, and their impact on civil–military relations in Nepal
Author(s): Adhikari, Monalisa
Contact Email: monalisa.adhikari@stir.ac.uk
Keywords: Civil-military relations
Nepal
peacekeeping
Issue Date: 28-Apr-2026
Date Deposited: 4-May-2026
Citation: Adhikari M (2026) “Discreet dominance”: peacekeeping deployments and international security force assistance, and their impact on civil–military relations in Nepal. <i>Defence Studies</i>. https://doi.org/10.1080/14702436.2026.2664460
Abstract: The Nepal Army has never attempted a coup or overtly obstructed transfer of power between different governments. Yet, the Nepal Army remains the most powerful institutions in Nepal, continues tower over civilian institutions, and prevails when civil–military relations are contested. This article explores the explanations for this “discreet dominance” of the military. While extant scholarship has focused on domestic variables to account for the military’s covert dominance, this article highlights the paradoxical effect of two external factors which contribute to the military’s discreet dominance: security assistance from international partners ranging from Western states as well as regional partners, India and China and increased demand and opportunities for UN peacekeeping deployments. Tracing the causal mechanism of the phenomenon, the article highlights how, on the one hand, prohibitions associated with troop contribution to UN’s peacekeeping missions, and security force assistance, have pressurized the Nepal Army to adapt some form of civilian control, notably the “anti-coup norm” leading it not to overtly intervene in civilian affairs through coups or interference in transfer of power. However, on the other hand, such external factors bestow significant political, economic and institutional benefits which enables the military to dominate its civilian counterparts and contributes to deterioration in civil–military relations.
DOI Link: 10.1080/14702436.2026.2664460
Rights: This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way. The terms on which this article has been published allow the posting of the Accepted Manuscript in a repository by the author(s) or with their consent.
Licence URL(s): http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/



This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.