Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/37903
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles
Peer Review Status: Refereed
Title: Defining Severity Levels for Post-Stroke Upper Limb Motor Impairment and Activity Limitation: A Systematic Review
Author(s): Ierardi, Elena
van Wijck, Frederike
Ali, Myzoon
Best, Catherine
Coupar, Fiona
Contact Email: catherine.best2@stir.ac.uk
Keywords: systematic review
upper limb
severity levels
motor impairment
activity limitation
Issue Date: Feb-2026
Date Deposited: 16-Feb-2026
Citation: Ierardi E, van Wijck F, Ali M, Best C & Coupar F (2026) Defining Severity Levels for Post-Stroke Upper Limb Motor Impairment and Activity Limitation: A Systematic Review. <i>NeuroRehabilitation</i>, 58 (1), pp. 3-16. https://doi.org/10.1177/10538135251393516
Abstract: Background Stroke often results in upper limb motor impairment and activity limitation, however terminology to describe severity levels vary. This hinders data pooling from clinical trials to inform practice. There are no reviews that have synthesized severity levels of stroke-related upper limb motor impairment or activity limitation. Objective To systematically review published literature on descriptors of severity levels for post-stroke upper limb motor impairment and activity limitation. Methods Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we searched eight major databases. Inclusion criteria: primary research studies, adults post-stroke, severity of upper limb motor impairment and/or activity limitation described. We classified included papers by assessing descriptor precision: ‘green’ (studies including descriptors that used recommended outcome measures, cut-offs or central tendency and dispersion), ‘red’ (descriptors only), and ‘amber’ (remaining studies). Of the ‘green’ studies, we identified the most commonly reported descriptors and measures, and computed cut-off scores using non-parametric statistics. Results From 17,273 records, 750 studies were included. The most commonly used severity descriptors were ‘mild, and/or moderate, and/or severe,’ used in 580 (77%) of studies. For the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (Upper Extremity) (57 studies, 8% of the total number of studies included), ‘severe’ ranged from 0 to 25, ‘moderate’ from 26 to 50, and ‘mild’ from 51 to 66. Limited data from the remaining studies prevented further analysis. Conclusions Our review highlights a lack of standardization of the operationalization of ‘severity’ of post-stroke upper limb motor impairment and activity limitation. It provides a foundation for developing a standardized clinical language to describe severity levels to improve research and clinical practice.
DOI Link: 10.1177/10538135251393516
Rights: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
Licence URL(s): http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Published version Neurorehabilitation paper.pdfFulltext - Published Version1.16 MBAdobe PDFView/Open



This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.