Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/36246
Appears in Collections:History and Politics Journal Articles
Peer Review Status: Refereed
Title: Global Norm-Maker as China’s New Brand? An Analysis of the Responsible Cobalt Initiative
Author(s): Park, Hyeyoon
Contact Email: hyeyoon.park@stir.ac.uk
Issue Date: 6-Apr-2023
Date Deposited: 26-Sep-2024
Citation: Park H (2023) Global Norm-Maker as China’s New Brand? An Analysis of the Responsible Cobalt Initiative. <i>The Chinese Journal of International Politics</i>, 16 (2), pp. 129-156. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjip/poad002
Abstract: China’s influence in extractive industry sectors worldwide has expanded in tandem with the rising global demand for the natural resources integral to producing such low carbon products as electric vehicles. Many Chinese-operated mining projects overseas have hence generated broad concern on the ground about their negative environmental and social impacts. Chinese actors, meanwhile, have begun to engage with transnational extractive governance initiatives entailing a transparency norm that requires disclosure of environmental and social risks. China, however, appears to be reshaping this transparency norm through its establishment of the Responsible Cobalt Initiative (RCI)—a China-led “transnational” governance initiative facilitating a Chinese version of that norm, known as “thin” transparency. Based on process-tracing and semi-structured interviews, in applying Acharya’s (2018) norm-circulation model, this paper examines what type of Chinese domestic actors act as norm-makers and under what conditions. The study thus refines certain core analytical concepts of the model. The RCI case stands alone in highlighting China’s growingly normative role in contesting the transparency norm through transnational interactions among Chinese and international actors in global extractives governance. The result shows China’s norm-making as a strategic choice of a local idea-shifter to cope with China’s internal and external legitimacy crises and to strengthen its emerging identity as a responsible great power. This study rejects the notion of China as a monolithic actor, rather suggesting a multi-agency and multilevel approach to understanding the complex realities of China’s normative leadership in global governance.
DOI Link: 10.1093/cjip/poad002
Rights: © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Institute of International Relations, Tsinghua University. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Licence URL(s): http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
poad002.pdfFulltext - Published Version1.08 MBAdobe PDFView/Open



This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.