Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/35433
Appears in Collections:History and Politics Journal Articles
Peer Review Status: Refereed
Title: Assessing the Social Values of Built Heritage: Participatory Methods as Ways of Knowing
Author(s): Robson, Elizabeth
Contact Email: e.m.robson@stir.ac.uk
Keywords: social value
built heritage
participatory methods
listed buildings
social housing
heritage management
Scotland
Issue Date: 10-Aug-2023
Date Deposited: 11-Sep-2023
Citation: Robson E (2023) Assessing the Social Values of Built Heritage: Participatory Methods as Ways of Knowing. <i>Architecture</i>, 3 (3), pp. 428-445. https://doi.org/10.3390/architecture3030023
Abstract: This paper explores the role participatory methods play in understanding the social values of built heritage, including people’s sense of identity, belonging, and place. It is based on research in Scotland where, as in many other countries, there is an increasing emphasis on contemporary significance and public participation within domestic heritage management frameworks. The paper draws on the experiences and findings of a social values assessment for Cables Wynd House, a Brutalist block of flats in Edinburgh that was listed in 2017. Through the case study assessment, conducted over six months in 2019, Cables Wynd House is manifested as a multiplicity of connected realities, diverse experiences, and micro-locations. The participatory methods reveal interactions and tensions be-tween the architectural design and aesthetics of the building and participants’ lived experiences and connections. The article argues that the mix of participatory methods provide different opportunities and ways of knowing, surfacing diversity, dissonance, and complexity. It highlights that participatory research is a collaborative process, requiring a flexible and responsive approach to methods. The paper concludes that participatory methods and collaborative approaches can provide nuanced and contextualised understandings of the social value of built heritage, which can complement but also diverge significantly from professional assessments of value. Wider adoption of these methods and the resulting understandings into the management and conservation of built heritage would support more people-centred, inclusive, and socially relevant forms of practice.
DOI Link: 10.3390/architecture3030023
Rights: © 2023 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Licence URL(s): http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Robson-2023-Architecture-03-428-445.pdfFulltext - Published Version1 MBAdobe PDFView/Open



This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.