Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1893/35373
Appears in Collections: | History and Politics Journal Articles |
Peer Review Status: | Refereed |
Title: | Educational equity in England: the shortcomings of the UK Government’s COVID-19 response |
Author(s): | Kippin, Sean |
Contact Email: | sean.kippin@stir.ac.uk |
Issue Date: | 28-Jul-2023 |
Date Deposited: | 7-Sep-2023 |
Citation: | Kippin S (2023) Educational equity in England: the shortcomings of the UK Government’s COVID-19 response. <i>Routledge Open Research</i>, 2, p. 24. https://doi.org/10.12688/routledgeopenres.17904.1 |
Abstract: | The UK Government sought to respond to lockdowns and lost learning during the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic in multiple ways, including replacing cancelled examinations and compensating for lost learning through a National Tutoring Programme. In the case of the former, the system failed to realise the demands of equity by privileging wealthier students and beating a path back to a flawed ‘normality.’ In the case of the latter, while the idea of providing targeted, high quality small group and one on one tutoring to the most in-need students was well-conceived, implementation was a failure - particularly following its contracting out to a large outsourcing company. These two cases demonstrate that English education policy is adherent to a neoliberal conception of education equity, and that attempts to address inequalities are constrained, backfire, or both. |
DOI Link: | 10.12688/routledgeopenres.17904.1 |
Rights: | © 2023 Kippin S. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited |
Licence URL(s): | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Educational Equity In England The Shortcomings Of The UK Government__s COVID-19 Response.pdf | Fulltext - Published Version | 6.32 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
This item is protected by original copyright |
A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.